Re: [VOTE] Backport CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0

I am +1 (nb) for 5.0. -0 for 4.0 and 4.1.I would rather promote people upgrade to the latest release to get new features.I also think we have been doing a pretty good job of backwards compatibility lately, so I would also promote the side projects using the latest release to work with data from old

Re: [VOTE] Backport CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0

As Josh mentioned previously, not all procedural votes treat -1s as vetoes. I remain against the backport to 4.0 and 4.1, but not a veto. -1 for those branches. On Aug 3, 2024, at 11:19 PM, Yifan Cai wrote:Hi,I am proposing backporting CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0. There is a dis

Re: [VOTE] Backport CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0

+1 (nb) On 2024/08/05 14:51:11 Jon Haddad wrote: > -0 for the reasons in the discuss thread. > > — > Jon Haddad > Rustyrazorblade Consulting > rustyrazorblade.com > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 7:13 AM Doug Rohrer wrote: > > > +1 (nb) > > > > > > On Aug 4, 2024, at 2:18 AM, Yifan Cai wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Backport CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0

-0 for the reasons in the discuss thread. — Jon Haddad Rustyrazorblade Consulting rustyrazorblade.com On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 7:13 AM Doug Rohrer wrote: > +1 (nb) > > > On Aug 4, 2024, at 2:18 AM, Yifan Cai wrote: > > Hi, > > I am proposing backporting CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and

Re: [VOTE] Backport CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0

+1 (nb) > On Aug 4, 2024, at 2:18 AM, Yifan Cai wrote: > > Hi, > > I am proposing backporting CASSANDRA-19800 to Cassandra-4.0, 4.1 and 5.0. > > There is a discussion thread > on the > topic. In summary, the backport would b