Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 5.0-rc1 (take3)

+1 (we're off rhel7, woot!) On 7/17/24 15:20, Mick Semb Wever wrote: On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 21:40, Brandon Williams > wrote: On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:36 PM Mick Semb Wever mailto:m...@apache.org>> wrote: > > Should we remove the noboolean rpm from the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 5.0-rc1 (take3)

The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has > tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered > binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and no -1's. > +1 Checked - signing correct - checksums correct - source artefact

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 5.0-rc1 (take3)

On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 21:40, Brandon Williams wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:36 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > > Should we remove the noboolean rpm from the release, given we have no > way to verify or test it ? > > Effectively, dropping centos:7 support from 5.0. > > I didn't look into wh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 5.0-rc1 (take3)

On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:36 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Should we remove the noboolean rpm from the release, given we have no way to > verify or test it ? > Effectively, dropping centos:7 support from 5.0. I didn't look into whether or not there were other distros that might need it. I shoul

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 5.0-rc1 (take3)

On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 at 13:10, Brandon Williams wrote: > +1 > > Note that centos7 went EOL on June 30th; I didn't test the noboolean > packages as a result. > Should we remove the noboolean rpm from the release, given we have no way to verify or test it ? Effectively, dropping centos:7 support

Re: [DISCUSS] Request for feedback re: new large features to (potentially) be added to the Apache Cassandra drivers still maintained by DataStax

Hello! Thanks for this! Would you release the results of the poll? That would be helpful since we are going to contribute to GoCQL once the donation is in place. Cheers, Carlos From: Bret McGuire Sent: 17 July 2024 00:05 To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: [

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace airlift/airline library with Picocli

> On 17. Jul 2024, at 01:28, David Capwell wrote: > > We also must weigh the risk of stability… Changing something for the sake of > changing it may get past all our CI then could break a user as they used > something we were not aware was being done (return codes, stdout/stderr, > etc.); re

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace airlift/airline library with Picocli

My CRA arguments basically revolve around the "Open Source Steward" from the CRA. As far as I recall, for open source software to be used in commercial projects it must be maintained by a steward. The definition of steward is being discussed but foundations generally meet the requirement, project