If we take this on - are there any active contributors that can be raised
as committers to maintain this project?
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:36 PM Nate McCall wrote:
> We've talked through this before. Benjamin sussed out the main issue,
> IIRC.
> tl,dr:
> - The AUTHORS lists everyone who ever mad
hi folks - sorry to have dropped the ball on responding to this thread.
My 2 cents are as follows -
1. Having a separate JIRA project for each sub-project will add management
overhead. This option, however, allows us to model unique workflows for the
sub-project.
2. Managing the sub-project as p
s3e2 - Otavio Santana
(You may have to download it to play)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RZLP-mpq01LtYBbQPiYS0YbP4WKf0nKG/view?usp=drive_link
It will remain in staging for 72 hours, going live (assuming no objections)
by Thursday, April 11th.
If anyone should have any questions or comments,
Hi Jon, Thanks for taking the time to read and reply to this proposal. Would encourage you to approach it from
an attitude of seeking understanding on the part of the first-time CEP author, as this reply casts it off
pretty quickly as NIH. The proposal isn't mine, but I'll offer a few notes on w
This seems like a lot of work to create an rsync alternative. I can't
really say I see the point. I noticed your "rejected alternatives"
mentions it with this note:
- However, it might not be permitted by the administrator or available
in various environments such as Kubernetes or virtual
