Re: Push TCM (CEP-21) and Accord (CEP-15) to 5.1 (and cut an immediate 5.1-alpha1)

2023-10-27 Thread German Eichberger via dev
Definitely want to second Josh. When I reached out on the ACCORD channel about testing folks were super helpful and transparent about bugs, etc. Frankly, I was pretty frustrated that ACCORD+TCM slipped. I was looking forward to it and felt let down - but I also haven't done anything to help othe

Re: Project Status Update: 90-day catch-up edition [2023-10-27]

2023-10-27 Thread Patrick McFadin
Sent you an invite Sam. Welcome to the community! On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 10:31 AM Sam wrote: > Please can I have an invite to the Slack workspace on this email. I'd like > to take a look through some of the items for first time contributors :-) > > Thanks! > > On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 18:10, Josh

Re: Project Status Update: 90-day catch-up edition [2023-10-27]

2023-10-27 Thread Sam
Please can I have an invite to the Slack workspace on this email. I'd like to take a look through some of the items for first time contributors :-) Thanks! On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 18:10, Josh McKenzie wrote: > In case you're keeping score on how frequently these are coming out: *please > stop*.

Re: Push TCM (CEP-21) and Accord (CEP-15) to 5.1 (and cut an immediate 5.1-alpha1)

2023-10-27 Thread Josh McKenzie
Lots of threads of thought have popped up here. The big one I feel needs to be clearly addressed and inspected is the implication of development not happening transparently and not being inclusive or available for participation by the community on major features. The CEP process + dedicated dev

Project Status Update: 90-day catch-up edition [2023-10-27]

2023-10-27 Thread Josh McKenzie
In case you're keeping score on how frequently these are coming out: *please stop*. ;) Silver lining - looks like we have a lot to discuss this round! Last update was late July and we've been churning through the 5.0 freeze and stabilization phase. *[New Contributors Getting Started] * Check

Re: Push TCM (CEP-21) and Accord (CEP-15) to 5.1 (and cut an immediate 5.1-alpha1)

2023-10-27 Thread Alex Petrov
Firstly, when talking about quality, many folks mention the risk of releasing bugs together with TCM and Accord. While I agree this risk is real, I would like to remind that TCM and Accord were extensively tested and simulated, for *many* hours. Just an example, we’ve recently filed an issue we

Re: Push TCM (CEP-21) and Accord (CEP-15) to 5.1 (and cut an immediate 5.1-alpha1)

2023-10-27 Thread Jacek Lewandowski
I've been thinking about this and I believe that if we ever decide to delay a release to include some CEPs, we should make the plan and status of those CEPs public. This should include publishing a branch, creating tickets for the remaining work required for feature completion in Jira, and notifyin

Re: Push TCM (CEP-21) and Accord (CEP-15) to 5.1 (and cut an immediate 5.1-alpha1)

2023-10-27 Thread Benjamin Lerer
I would be interested in testing Maxim's approach. We need more visibility on big features and their progress to improve our coordination. Hopefully it will also open the door to more collaboration on those big projects. Le jeu. 26 oct. 2023 à 21:35, German Eichberger via dev < dev@cassandra.apach