Re: CASSANDRA-18775 (Cassandra supported OSs)

+1 on removal the whole lib if we are sure we don’t need it. Nothing better than some healthy house cleaning -1 on partial removals On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 17:34, David Capwell wrote: > +1 to drop the whole lib… > > > On Oct 20, 2023, at 7:55 AM, Jeremiah Jordan > wrote: > > Agreed. -1 on sel

Re: CASSANDRA-18775 (Cassandra supported OSs)

+1 to drop the whole lib… > On Oct 20, 2023, at 7:55 AM, Jeremiah Jordan > wrote: > > Agreed. -1 on selectively removing any of the libs. But +1 for removing the > whole thing if it is no longer used. > > -Jeremiah > > On Oct 20, 2023 at 9:28:55 AM, Mick Semb Wever

Re: CASSANDRA-18775 (Cassandra supported OSs)

Agreed. -1 on selectively removing any of the libs. But +1 for removing the whole thing if it is no longer used. -Jeremiah On Oct 20, 2023 at 9:28:55 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > Does anyone see any reason _not_ to do this? >> > > > Thanks for bring this to dev@ > > I see reason not to do it

Re: CASSANDRA-18775 (Cassandra supported OSs)

> > Does anyone see any reason _not_ to do this? > Thanks for bring this to dev@ I see reason not to do it, folk do submit patches for other archs despite us not formally maintaining and testing the code for those archs. Some examples are PPC64 Big Endian (CASSANDRA-7476), s390x (CASSANDRA-1772

Re: CASSANDRA-18775 (Cassandra supported OSs)

As noted on CASSANDRA-16565 we don't actually need sigar for anything, so I don't see a reason to keep any of it, especially if that is going to force us to specify OSes. Kind Regards, Brandon On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 9:04 AM Claude Warren, Jr via dev wrote: > > I am looking at https://issues.apa

CASSANDRA-18775 (Cassandra supported OSs)

I am looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18775 and want to ensure that I do not remove too many libraries. I think that preserving any sigar library where the file name contains the word "linux" or "macosx" should be acceptable. This will preserve: libsigar-amd64-linux.so l