Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.14

2023-05-16 Thread Dinesh Joshi
Vote passes with 7 +1s and no -1s. thanks everybody. On 5/15/23 15:12, Dinesh Joshi wrote: > Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.14 for release. > > Repository: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra-in-jvm-dtest-api.git > > Candidate SHA: > https://github.com/apache/cas

Re: [DISCUSS] Bring cassandra-harry in tree as a submodule

2023-05-16 Thread Jeremy Hanna
I think it would be great to onboard Harry more officially into the project. However it would be nice to perhaps do some sanity checking outside of Apple folks to see how approachable it is. That is, can someone take it and just run it with the current readme without any additional context? I

Re: [DISCUSS] Feature branch version hygiene

2023-05-16 Thread Ekaterina Dimitrova
I do not think we discussed it from feature branch perspective. (Happy to stand corrected but I did not find anything in @dev archive myself) But we do mark with 5.0 anything that lands in trunk. I think it might be a good idea anything that lands in a feature branch to have different fix version u

Re: [DISCUSS] Feature branch version hygiene

2023-05-16 Thread Caleb Rackliffe
...but that and "What do we do with things that might be in 5.0 and might not?" are different questions. A version that denotes "next major release" until merged (at which point it could be given a real version) could be helpful... On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 3:28 PM Caleb Rackliffe wrote: > I like

Re: [DISCUSS] Feature branch version hygiene

2023-05-16 Thread Caleb Rackliffe
I like the NA approach for sub-tasks that roll up to a parent/epic ticket. When that lands, it gets a real version, and any sub-task is assumed to also have that version. Not that it has to be called "NA", but there should be something to denote "inherits from parent". On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 3:0

Re: [DISCUSS] Feature branch version hygiene

2023-05-16 Thread Benedict
Copying my rely on the ticket… We have this discussion roughly once per major. If you look back through dev@ you'll find the last one a few years back. I don't recall NA ever being the approved approach, though. ".x" lines are target versions, whereas concrete versions are the ones a fix landed

[DISCUSS] Feature branch version hygiene

2023-05-16 Thread J. D. Jordan
Process question/discussion. Should tickets that are merged to CEP feature branches, like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18204, have a fixver of 5.0 on them After merging to the feature branch? For the SAI CEP which is also using the feature branch method the "reviewed and mer

Re: [DISCUSS] Bring cassandra-harry in tree as a submodule

2023-05-16 Thread Abe Ratnofsky
Just to make sure I'm understanding the details, this would mean apache/cassandra-harry maintains its status as a separate repository, apache/cassandra references it as a submodule, and clones and builds Harry locally, rather than pulling a released JAR. We can then reference Harry as a library

[DISCUSS] Bring cassandra-harry in tree as a submodule

2023-05-16 Thread Josh McKenzie
Similar to what we've done with accord in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18204, I'd like to discuss bringing cassandra-harry in-tree as a submodule. repo link: https://github.com/apache/cassandra-harry Given the value it's brought to the project's stabilization efforts and the

Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX

2023-05-16 Thread Caleb Rackliffe
I might as well weigh in... [POLL] Centralize existing syntax or create new syntax? 1.) CREATE INDEX ... USING ... WITH OPTIONS... (I think the more important protection for users WRT local indexes should come in the form of a guardrail prohibiting scatter/gather queries against them.) [POLL] S

Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.14

2023-05-16 Thread Jon Meredith
+1 On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 3:39 AM Andrés de la Peña wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, 16 May 2023 at 07:24, Alex Petrov wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, May 16, 2023, at 4:45 AM, Doug Rohrer wrote: >> >> +1 (nb) >> >> Doug Rohrer >> >> > On May 15, 2023, at 7:17 PM, Brandon Williams wrote: >> > >> > +1 >>

Re: Cassandra 4.0-beta1 available on FreeBSD

2023-05-16 Thread Miklosovic, Stefan
Great stuff, Lapo! I was looking into FreeBSD ports few days ago to see what Cassandra version it supports as I have BSDs as a hobby ... Can't wait until I see 4.1! BTW I noticed there is quite a lot of patches to make Cassandra run on FreeBSD (1). Would you be maybe interesting in submitting

Re: Cassandra 4.0-beta1 available on FreeBSD

2023-05-16 Thread Lapo Luchini
Now updated to 4.0.8! 🎉 (yes, I know, 4.0.9 was released during the process…) Next step will be to upgrade to 4.1. cheers, Lapo On 2020-07-27 19:28, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: Thank you Angelo for supporting the project with this! Truly appreciate it! Best, Ekaterina On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 at

Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.14

2023-05-16 Thread Andrés de la Peña
+1 On Tue, 16 May 2023 at 07:24, Alex Petrov wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, May 16, 2023, at 4:45 AM, Doug Rohrer wrote: > > +1 (nb) > > Doug Rohrer > > > On May 15, 2023, at 7:17 PM, Brandon Williams wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Kind Regards, > > Brandon > > > >> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 5:12 PM Dinesh