Re: A proposal for refactoring the CircleCI config

Here is the ticket I was talking about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17600 > On Nov 2, 2022, at 1:29 PM, Derek Chen-Becker wrote: > >> For the parallel param logic, sounds fine to me. Not sure if this would >> also wo

Re: A proposal for refactoring the CircleCI config

> For the parallel param logic, sounds fine to me. Not sure if this would also > work for resource_type, but I still argue that xlarge isn’t needed in 90% of > the cases its used… so fixing this may be better than param there…. So yes, I > would be cool with this change if it basically removes

Re: A proposal for refactoring the CircleCI config

Thanks for starting this thread! If I am reading correctly, there are 2 main improvements proposed: move parallel value to a param and have our “patches” update those and not the jobs themselves, look into / use matrix to define the set of jobs we need… For the parallel param logic, sounds fine