Re: CEP-15 multi key transaction syntax

2022-06-12 Thread bened...@apache.org
Welcome Li, and thanks for your input > When I first saw the syntax, I took it for granted that the condition was > evaluated against the state AFTER the updates Depending what you mean, I think this is one of the options being considered. At least, it seems this syntax is most likely to be eva

Re: CEP-15 multi key transaction syntax

2022-06-12 Thread Li Boxuan
Correcting my typo: > I took it for granted that the condition was evaluated against the state > before the updates I took it for granted that the condition was evaluated against the state AFTER the updates On Jun 12, 2022, at 11:07 AM, Li Boxuan mailto:libox...@connect.hku.hk>> wrote: Than

Re: CEP-15 multi key transaction syntax

2022-06-12 Thread Li Boxuan
Thank you team for this exciting update! I just joined the dev mailing list to take part in this discussion. I am not a Cassandra developer and haven’t understood Accord myself yet, so my questions are more from a user’s standpoint. > The COMMIT IF syntax is more succinct, but ambiguity isn’t id

Re: CEP-15 multi key transaction syntax

2022-06-12 Thread bened...@apache.org
> I would love hearing from people on what they think. ^^ It would be great to have more participants in this conversation > For context, my questions earlier were based on my 20+ years of using SQL > transactions across different systems. We probably don’t come from a very different place. I s