Thanks for coordinating this. I'm happy to incorporate the manual process
(option 1) in my workflow when reviewing/publishing blog PRs immediately as
a quick solution if our intention is to go with option 2.
FWIW by "workflow" I mean step 6 of the Pipeline Overview documented in the
wiki here -- h
I also like it, thank you for putting it together. We can always add more
and more, but I think the current one is already quite extensive. I like
the dependency management point.
I want to clarify a bit only one point. Any kind of old warnings and code
cleaning. If it is not immediately related t
Looks great!
On Mon, May 30, 2022, 5:37 AM bened...@apache.org
wrote:
> Any more feedback around this? Everyone happy with the latest proposal?
>
>
>
> *From: *bened...@apache.org
> *Date: *Sunday, 15 May 2022 at 15:08
> *To: *dev@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject: *Re: Updating our Code Contrib
Any more feedback around this? Everyone happy with the latest proposal?
From: bened...@apache.org
Date: Sunday, 15 May 2022 at 15:08
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Updating our Code Contribution/Style Guide
I agree with this sentiment, but I think it will require a bit of time to
fig
Nice initiative! All options look good to me in this preference order: 2,
1, 3.
Em seg., 30 de mai. de 2022 às 06:34, Benjamin Lerer
escreveu:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Chris has been looking with the web design team about adding an RSS feed
> to our website. Unfortunately there are some complications
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 6:23 AM Erick Ramirez wrote:
>
> Yeah, I agree. But in any case, is the dependency check relevant?
It requires that java be installed, so I think so.
> It's just expecting a Java higher than 8 which should be covered by
the JVM version check in the startup script, right?
Yeah, I agree. But in any case, is the dependency check relevant? It's just
expecting a Java higher than 8 which should be covered by the JVM version
check in the startup script, right?
I read your ticket
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17669) and understand
now. If they are only offered the JDK and not the JRE broken out on
its own, we can switch the dependency to the JDK. I'm not sure why
they didn't just alias that since the JDK is the only way to get a JRE
n
The only thing in the spec is:
Requires: jre >= 1.8.0
Kind Regards,
Brandon
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 2:21 AM Erick Ramirez wrote:
>
> Package installations on CentOS/RHEL require JRE 1.8+ so on systems where
> only Java 11 is installed, either (a) Java 8 is installed as a dependency, or
>
Hi everybody,
Chris has been looking with the web design team about adding an RSS feed to
our website. Unfortunately there are some complications due to Antora. We
currently have 3 options:
1. Have an XML file on the site that can get updated manually whenever a
new blog post gets added. As we ma
>
> Downloads of source and binary distributions are listed in our download
> section:
>
> http://cassandra.apache.org/download/
>
> This version is the first alpha release[1] on the 4.1 series. As always,
> please pay attention to the release notes[2] and Let us know[3] if you were
> to encounter
Package installations on CentOS/RHEL require JRE 1.8+ so on systems where
only Java 11 is installed, either (a) Java 8 is installed as a dependency,
or (b) the dependency check fails.
I haven't seen any tickets or previous discussions on this issue so here it
is -- since JRE is no longer available
12 matches
Mail list logo
