Sorry about that; used -1/+1 to show preference, not binding action
> On Oct 28, 2021, at 5:50 AM, bened...@apache.org wrote:
>
>> I am -1 here, for the reasons listed above; the problem (in my eye) is not
>> reader/writer but higher level at the actual SSTable. If we plug out
>> read/write bu
> I am -1 here, for the reasons listed above; the problem (in my eye) is not
> reader/writer but higher level at the actual SSTable. If we plug out
> read/write but still allow direct file access, then these abstractions fail
> to provide the goals of the CEP.
Be careful dropping -1s, as your
