Resolved comment discussions in the design document that are closed.
If there is no further feedback, I will start a voting thread tomorrow.
Thanks,
Sumanth
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 6:54 AM Joshua McKenzie wrote:
> I'm +1 on where it currently stands after the revisions. Consider resolving
> out
Hi Jake,
> What structural changes are planned to support an external dependency project
> like this
To add to Blake’s answer, in case there’s some confusion over this, the
proposal is to include this library within the Apache Cassandra project. So I
wouldn’t think of it as an external depende
The Cassandra team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Cassandra
version 4.0.1.
Apache Cassandra is a fully distributed database. It is the right choice when
you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance.
http://cassandra.apache.org/
Downloads of sourc
Great thanks for the information
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 12:44 PM Blake Eggleston
wrote:
> Hi Jake,
>
> > 1. Will this effort eventually replace consistency levels in C*? I ask
> > because one of the shortcomings of our paxos today is
> > it can be easily mixed with non serialized consistencies
So this thread stalled almost a year ago. (Wow, time flies when you're
trying to release 4.0.) My synthesis of the conversation to this point is
that while there are some open questions about testing
methodology/"definition of done" and our choice of particular on-disk data
structures, neither of t
Hi Jake,
> 1. Will this effort eventually replace consistency levels in C*? I ask
> because one of the shortcomings of our paxos today is
> it can be easily mixed with non serialized consistencies and therefore
> users commonly break consistency by for example reading at CL.ONE while
> also
> us
Hi Benedict!
I haven't gone too deeply into this proposal but it's very exciting to see
this kind of innovation!
Some basic questions which are tangentially related with this effort I
didn't see covered in the CEP.
1. Will this effort eventually replace consistency levels in C*? I ask
because
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 5:06 PM bened...@apache.org
wrote:
> > I was thinking that a path similar to Calvin/FaunaDB is certainly
> looming in the horizon at least.
>
> I’m not sure which aspect of these systems you are referring to. Unless I
> have misunderstood, I consider them to be strictly inf
> I was thinking that a path similar to Calvin/FaunaDB is certainly looming in
> the horizon at least.
I’m not sure which aspect of these systems you are referring to. Unless I have
misunderstood, I consider them to be strictly inferior approaches (particularly
for Cassandra) as they require a
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 12:26 PM bened...@apache.org
wrote:
> > whether I should just* think of this as "better and more efficient LWT”
>
> So, the LWT concept is a Cassandra one and doesn’t have an agreed-upon
> definition. My understanding of a core feature/limitation of LWTs is that
> they oper
> Sorry if a few comments were a bit "editorial" in the first message
Not a problem at all – more than happy to talk about suggestions in that vein!
Just probably best not to subject everyone else to the discussion.
> What I would like to understand better and without guessing is, what do these
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 1:31 AM bened...@apache.org
wrote:
>
> Of course, but we may have to be selective in our back-and-forth. We can
> always take some discussion off-list to keep it manageable.
>
>
I'll try to converge.Sorry if a few comments were a bit "editorial" in the
first message. I find
12 matches
Mail list logo
