+1
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 7:41 PM Ekaterina Dimitrova
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 19:40, David Capwell
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > > On Aug 27, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Patrick McFadin
> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 nb
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 1:02 PM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
+1
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 19:40, David Capwell
wrote:
> +1
>
> > On Aug 27, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Patrick McFadin wrote:
> >
> > +1 nb
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 1:02 PM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >>> On Aug 27, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Scott Andreas
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
>
+1
> On Aug 27, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Patrick McFadin wrote:
>
> +1 nb
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 1:02 PM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>> On Aug 27, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Scott Andreas wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
On Aug 27, 2021, at 12:58 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
>
>
+1 nb
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 1:02 PM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> +1
>
> > On Aug 27, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Scott Andreas wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> >> On Aug 27, 2021, at 12:58 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Proposal:
> >>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/C
Push vs pull isn’t too critical, but there is one edge case to consider; if we
didn’t think the participate got restarted triggering validation again (which
may have caused the process to end) could be a problem.
> On Aug 26, 2021, at 9:50 AM, Yifan Cai wrote:
>
>>
>> 2. Add retries to specif
+1
> On Aug 27, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Scott Andreas wrote:
>
> +1
>
>> On Aug 27, 2021, at 12:58 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Proposal:
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-14%3A+Paxos+Improvements
>>> Discussion:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.h
+1
> On Aug 27, 2021, at 12:48 PM, bened...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Hi everyone, I’m proposing this CEP for approval.
>
> Proposal:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-14%3A+Paxos+Improvements
> Discussion:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1af3da2d875ef93479e387407
+1
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 2:55 PM bened...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Hi everyone, I’m proposing this CEP for approval.
>
> Proposal:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-14%3A+Paxos+Improvements
> Discussion:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1af3da2d875ef93479e3874072
+1
> On Aug 27, 2021, at 12:58 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>> Proposal:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-14%3A+Paxos+Improvements
>> Discussion:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1af3da2d875ef93479e3874072ee651f406b96c915759c7968d3266e%40%3Cdev.cas
>
> Proposal:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-14%3A+Paxos+Improvements
> Discussion:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1af3da2d875ef93479e3874072ee651f406b96c915759c7968d3266e%40%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> Votes by commi
Hi everyone, I’m proposing this CEP for approval.
Proposal:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-14%3A+Paxos+Improvements
Discussion:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1af3da2d875ef93479e3874072ee651f406b96c915759c7968d3266e%40%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E
The vote wil
I can see the case for all three:
* Deny both reads and writes to a partition (wide, heavily tombstones, too
many stables, etc) causing disruption to a replica set; don't want further
growth nor reads until operator intervention
* Deny reads but allow writing to rectify problems on a partition
(int
Apologize, seems I sent the tickets and didn’t see the last mail from
Enrico which arrived in the meantime.
I will check the link, thanks for sharing!
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 9:17, Brandon Williams wrote:
> Thanks for pointing this out, Enrico! It looks like Cassandra could
> be a natural fit he
Thanks for pointing this out, Enrico! It looks like Cassandra could
be a natural fit here since it's already using OpenJDK quite a bit.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 7:47 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> (sorry if being slightly off-topic, but let be throw this ball here)
>
> What about joining the OpenJ
Thank you all for your valuable feedback.
I just created below two tickets to facilitate the outcome of the
discussion:
- CASSANDRA-16894 - Java 11 support - remove the experimental flag
- CASSANDRA-16895 - Support Java 17
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 8:47, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> (sorry if being sli
(sorry if being slightly off-topic, but let be throw this ball here)
What about joining the OpenJDK Quality outreach program?
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/quality/Quality+Outreach
Many other Apache projects contribute to that initiative and this helps
Java to be always compatible with th
Hi,
CASSANDRA-16882 has patches for any of the mentioned configurations aimed
to save CircleCI resources.
There are CircleCI runs showing how each approach would look like, plus an
additional fourth option:
1. Make the entire workflow optional:
https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/adelapena
Thanks for the script Mick. I found it really useful to have a better view
of people's contributions.
Le lun. 9 août 2021 à 16:18, Mick Semb Wever a écrit :
> >
> > The following metrics provide top lists of contributors for different
> time
> > periods. Listing patches, reviews, and who has wor
+1 on my side too for removal of experimental for 11, and moving trunk to
11+17
Le jeu. 26 août 2021 à 22:28, Nate McCall a écrit :
> >
> >
> > Last but not least, do we know anyone running Java 11 in production?
> > This thread was really opened as a stage to share our thoughts and
> > hopefu
Just wanted to mention that I am super eager to see your proposal
implemented, Benedict. Thanks for pushing this forward :-)
Le mer. 25 août 2021 à 10:29, bened...@apache.org a
écrit :
> I’ll move this to a vote in a day or so, assuming no further discussion.
>
> From: Jeff Jirsa
> Date: Monday
20 matches
Mail list logo
