>
>
> Last but not least, do we know anyone running Java 11 in production?
> This thread was really opened as a stage to share our thoughts and
> hopefully come up with a plan as a community.
>
I am aware of many large deployments using Java11 and 4.0 in production. +1
on making this non experime
+1 from me on both as well.
> On Aug 26, 2021, at 12:44 PM, Paulo Motta wrote:
>
> +1 to both removal of experimental for 11, and moving trunk to 11+17
>
>> Em qui., 26 de ago. de 2021 às 14:40, Brandon Williams
>> escreveu:
>>
>> +1 to both removal of experimental for 11, and moving trunk t
Throwing my two cents out…
I'm keen for us to better adhere to SemVer rules (I've said this before).
Specifically defining the difference between a Major and a Minor version,
and defining the difference between a Minor and a Patch version (which in
turn addresses your questions Josh). But this i
Thank you, Josh for the elaborate explanation of a potential scenario where
denylisting writes would make sense.
I, 100% agree that could benefit in a situation where we would want to deny
writes to a partition that we do not have much control on (which is true in
most situations) and such behavior
+1 to both removal of experimental for 11, and moving trunk to 11+17
Em qui., 26 de ago. de 2021 às 14:40, Brandon Williams
escreveu:
> +1 to both removal of experimental for 11, and moving trunk to 11+17
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 12:35 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I and contribu
+1 to both removal of experimental for 11, and moving trunk to 11+17
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 12:35 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> >
> > I and contributors I work with have deployed 4.0 + JDK11 in production,
> > have found no issues, and would treat any issues that arise as ones we’re
> > able to
The discussion came up on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16873 concerning where
we land different diff types and it was clear the conversation should
come to the ML and the outcome be codified for the future.
Some useful pre-reading on the Release Lifecycle on our wiki:
https://cw
>
> I and contributors I work with have deployed 4.0 + JDK11 in production,
> have found no issues, and would treat any issues that arise as ones we’re
> able to jump on and contribute development + review resources to resolve in
> the project.
>
That's everything I need to hear. Let's remove the
>
> 2. Add retries to specific stages of coordination, such as prepare and
>validate. In order to do these retries we first need to know what the
state is for the participant which has yet to reply...
If I understand it correctly, does it mean retries only happen in the
coordinator and th
+1 from me, any improvement in this area would be great.
It would be nice if this could include visibility into repair streams, but just
exposing the repair state will be a big improvement.
> On Aug 25, 2021, at 5:46 PM, David Capwell wrote:
>
> Now that 4.0 is out, I want to bring up improvin
The design doc and CEP currently pass on blocklisting / denylisting writes
at this time. In the proposed new patch it states:
"Note: We do not want to blacklist writes since it is the reads that
primarily impact the performance when reading a bad partition, and we may
want writes to be allowed to “
+1 for moving Java 11 support out of experimental for 4.0 at minimum, and no
concern with doing so for 3.0/3.11 if someone were to propose.
I and contributors I work with have deployed 4.0 + JDK11 in production, have
found no issues, and would treat any issues that arise as ones we’re able to
j
One of the things I'm excited about with the 4+ releases is this running with
Java 17+ (including ZGC) so I would love to see this get more serious testing
and validation.
Anecdotal account - at an event a couple of years ago, I spoke to someone from
an education software company was running so
Hi everyone,
I had a few people asking me recently about the Java 11 support.
I came across this thread we had last year -
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r38f6beaa22e247cb38212f476f5f79efdc6587f83af0397406c06d7c%40%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E
.
I think we have all tests running in both Java
14 matches
Mail list logo
