The test build of Cassandra 4.0.0 is available.
sha1: a46146fb4ae87bfb8c6a895b2987d3a8944cab39
Git:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.0.0-tentative
Maven Artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1239/org/apache/cass
Based on my experience I definitely like the process where everything that
needs to be discussed about CEP remains in DISCUSS thread.
Also I like the comment made above " The jira ticket and PR can be created
as a PoC to help explain and illustrate the CEP, but nothing more than
that.". Sometimes
Or maybe someone _can_ comment on the JIRA but should also for sure put
that same comment in the discussion thread? That way, it is at worst
redundant and doesn't get lost as a comment on a JIRA many may not see?
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 3:32 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> > I think that’s a bit extr
Thanks so much Brandon and Benjamin for your important work here, very
valuable and much appreciated.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 9:20 AM Benjamin Lerer wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> One of the main issues that has been raised in the* Attracting new
> contributors thread *is the time needed before a pat
> I think that’s a bit extreme – …
Yeah, that was kinda my intention. But my thinking was just about getting
us out of our habits of using JIRA. Of course I didn't mean any censure.
Once we have some precedence in place, common-sense should prevail.
Perhaps we should put together a cheat sheet
I think that’s a bit extreme – it seems perfectly fine to comment on Jira, but
high level discussions around scope, goals and potential confounders should
ideally happen on the DISCUSS thread. It’s a difficult balancing act, choosing
the venue for a discussion, so let’s not censure people unnece
My understanding is that they should have been raised on the DISCUSSION
> thread. Once those concerns are addressed or discussed, I believe that if
> nobody raised more concerns we should trigger a VOTE.
>
> Is my understanding correct?
>
Agree, we shouldn't be commenting on jira tickets or on P
That’s how I understand the process, yes. Voting to accept the CEP just
indicates that the broad strokes painted by the CEP are acceptable to the
community, and a patch can be brought forward with the expectation that it will
be accepted once it meets the other criteria for acceptance.
From: Be
Hi everybody,
CEPs are now a required step for important changes to the Cassandra code
base. Nevertheless, this process is new for all of us and beyond creating a
CEP it seems a bit unclear what needs to be done to get the CEP approved.
I will take as an example the CEP-9: Make SSLContext creatio
That sounds good to me. Thanks a lot Brandon and Ekaterina for taking care
of that.
Le mer. 7 juil. 2021 à 23:47, Ekaterina Dimitrova a
écrit :
> Hey everyone,
> Considering the latest report of patches which need a reviewer, I think
> this new Jira state is a great addition.
> I took it one ste
10 matches
Mail list logo
