There is certainly a lack of clarity in the grouping, as a number of those
services are not offering Apache Cassandra. I would suggest another
category along the lines of "Cassandra Protocol compatible offerings".
That way users can easily distinguish between ecosystem offerings where
"the driver
No major opinion on the "cloud offerings" piece, but I agree people should
know what they are getting into, and be able to make an informed decision.
However, if someone is going down that path, I would hope they do the
due-diligence to make sure it fits their requirements.
1 small update I would
Under Cloud Offerings, are we comfortable implicitly endorsing “API compatible”
offerings that aren’t actually Cassandra, and also don’t (as far as I am aware)
fully support Cassandra functionality? Should we at least mention that this is
the case?
From: Melissa Logan
Date: Tuesday, 22 June 2
Hi all,
The Cassandra community recently updated its website and has added several
new entries to the Ecosystem page: https://cassandra.apache.org/ecosystem/.
If you have edits or know of other third-party Cassandra projects, tools,
products, etc that may be useful to others -- please get in touc
