I think, given your revised statements around the bugs discovered with the
flaky tests, and given that these don’t seem to have been serious bugs, I’m
comfortable with a two week period post-RC2.
From: Benjamin Lerer
Date: Tuesday, 15 June 2021 at 12:41
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: R
>
> We do have to cut another RC given the seriousness of CASSANDRA-16735
> though, right?
I do not disagree with that. I just would like to see us more precise with
our expectations for releasing 4.0 GA, considering that we have already
deeply tested the code.
Would it make sense to say: "Let's
That popularity line is a lot more stable than I would have expected, honestly,
given the huge shifts in the database landscape in the intervening years.
Though of course I’m sure we’d all rather it were trending upwards. I think the
release of 4.0 is likely to have minimal impact on that, thoug
As the list of flaky tests was filtered out I wanted to add some
information about the test that revealed real issues. First there was a
mistake: only 3 of the issues were revealed by flaky tests. The other one
was a user report.
>From the 3 remaining tickets only 2 were 4.0 bugs: CASSANDRA-16238
<
