+1
On 30/3/21 3:43, David Capwell wrote:
> +1
>
>> On Mar 29, 2021, at 2:48 PM, Benedict Elliott Smith
>> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On 29/03/2021, 21:16, "Ben Bromhead" wrote:
>>
>>+1 good sensible suggestion.
>>
>>On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:37 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova
>>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
+1
Dinesh
> On Mar 29, 2021, at 1:41 PM, Nate McCall wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 2:06 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>>
>> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0-rc1 for release.
>>
>> sha1: 2facbc97ea215faef1735d9a3d5697162f61bc8c
>> Git:
>>
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/r
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 3:45 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> It good to see you are taking action, but I think the situation is a
> little more seriously that you may realise, I suggest you look at what
> actions the board has taken in similar situations in the past. I'll update
> the board agenda it
+1
> On Mar 29, 2021, at 2:48 PM, Benedict Elliott Smith
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 29/03/2021, 21:16, "Ben Bromhead" wrote:
>
>+1 good sensible suggestion.
>
>On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:37 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova
>wrote:
>
>> I also like the latest suggestion, +1, thank you
>>
>>
Hi,
I wanted to call attention to the fact that while we removed Windows
support on CASSANDRA-16171 [1], we haven't added instructions on how to run
Cassandra on Windows with docker/WSL
for those users that potentially relied on Windows support.
(CASSANDRA-16173[2], CASSANDRA-15887[3]).
While we
> I think the situation is a little more seriously that you may realise, I
> suggest you look at what actions the board has taken in similar situations in
> the past
I thought you had already indicated the likely remedy: the removal of
non-compliant releases?
I’m puzzled by your desire f
> I am planning to open some follow up discussions for those points in the
coming weeks.
Awesome, thanks for coordinating this!
> It is a valid point. Do you mind if I update the documentation when we
have
clarified the version names and that we have a more precise idea of when
4.0 GA will be rel
Hi,
> To the PMC: the next boarding meeting is on 21st April, so we have time to
> get this release out and probably more as well (hopefully with the fix
> for CASSANDRA-16391) before that date.
If I was a PMC member here, I would reconsider making that release without
fixing this issue. I would
+1 excellent proposal. It makes it easier for the community to understand
and plan ahead.
I wanted to suggest an addendum that a review of 4.0/3.x support be done in
(say) April 2022 in case of delays with 5.x [and beyond]. Thoughts?
On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 at 01:41, Joseph Lynch wrote:
> I am slig
+1
On 29/03/2021, 21:16, "Ben Bromhead" wrote:
+1 good sensible suggestion.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:37 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova
wrote:
> I also like the latest suggestion, +1, thank you
>
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 14:16, Yifan Cai wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
>
+1
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 2:06 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0-rc1 for release.
>
> sha1: 2facbc97ea215faef1735d9a3d5697162f61bc8c
> Git:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.0-rc1-tentative
> Maven Artifacts:
>
+1 good sensible suggestion.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:37 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova
wrote:
> I also like the latest suggestion, +1, thank you
>
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 14:16, Yifan Cai wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 8:42 AM J. D. Jordan
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 that deprecation s
I also like the latest suggestion, +1, thank you
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 14:16, Yifan Cai wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 8:42 AM J. D. Jordan
> wrote:
>
> > +1 that deprecation schedule seems reasonable and a good thing to move
> to.
> >
> > > On Mar 29, 2021, at 10:23 AM, Benjamin Lere
+1 nb
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 9:33 AM Aleksey Yeshchenko
wrote:
> +1
>
> > On 29 Mar 2021, at 14:05, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> >
> > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0-rc1 for release.
> >
> > sha1: 2facbc97ea215faef1735d9a3d5697162f61bc8c
> > Git:
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/as
+1
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 8:42 AM J. D. Jordan
wrote:
> +1 that deprecation schedule seems reasonable and a good thing to move to.
>
> > On Mar 29, 2021, at 10:23 AM, Benjamin Lerer wrote:
> >
> > The proposal sounds good to me too.
> >
> >> Le lun. 29 mars 2021 à 16:48, Brandon Williams a
>
+1
> On 29 Mar 2021, at 14:05, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0-rc1 for release.
>
> sha1: 2facbc97ea215faef1735d9a3d5697162f61bc8c
> Git:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.0-rc1-tentative
> Maven Artifacts:
> http
+1 that deprecation schedule seems reasonable and a good thing to move to.
> On Mar 29, 2021, at 10:23 AM, Benjamin Lerer wrote:
>
> The proposal sounds good to me too.
>
>> Le lun. 29 mars 2021 à 16:48, Brandon Williams a écrit :
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 9:41 AM Joseph Lynch
>>> wrot
The proposal sounds good to me too.
Le lun. 29 mars 2021 à 16:48, Brandon Williams a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 9:41 AM Joseph Lynch
> wrote:
> > I like the idea of the 3-year support cycles, but I think since
> > 3.0/3.11/4.0 took so long to stabilize to a point folks could upgrade
> >
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 9:41 AM Joseph Lynch wrote:
> I like the idea of the 3-year support cycles, but I think since
> 3.0/3.11/4.0 took so long to stabilize to a point folks could upgrade
> to, we should reset the clock somewhat.
I agree, the length of time to release 4.0 and the initialization
I am slightly concerned about removing support for critical bug fixes
in 3.0 on a short time-frame (<1 year). I know of at least a few major
installations, including ours, who are just now able to finish
upgrades to 3.0 in production due to the number of correctness and
performance bugs introduced
Thanks for your answers.
I agree to this proposal but I'm suggesting we close and codify the release
> cadence discussion from [1] before we lift the freeze, and maybe kick off
> the roadmap discussion but we probably shouldn't block the unfreeze on
> this.
>
Sorry, for not closing the release d
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 14:50, Brandon Williams wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 8:05 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> >
> > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0-rc1 for release.
> >
> > sha1: 2facbc97ea215faef1735d9a3d5697162f61bc8c
> > Git:
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.
+1
On 29/3/21 15:50, Brandon Williams wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 8:05 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0-rc1 for release.
>>
>> sha1: 2facbc97ea215faef1735d9a3d5697162f61bc8c
>> Git:
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog
+1
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 8:05 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0-rc1 for release.
>
> sha1: 2facbc97ea215faef1735d9a3d5697162f61bc8c
> Git:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.0-rc1-tentative
> Maven Artifacts:
> ht
+1 and thanks everyone for all the hard work
Checked:
- gpg signatures
- sha checksums
- binary convenience artifact runs
- src convenience artifacts builds with one command, and runs
- deb and rpm install and run
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 9:39, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021
Thanks to everybody and sorry for not finalizing that email thread sooner.
For the release cadence the agreement is:* one release every year +
periodic trunc snapshot*
For the number of releases being supported the agreement is 3. *Every
incoming release should be supported for 3 years.*
We did
+1
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 8:06 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0-rc1 for release.
>
> sha1: 2facbc97ea215faef1735d9a3d5697162f61bc8c
> Git:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.0-rc1-tentative
> Maven Artifacts:
>
>
>
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has
> > tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered
> > binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and no
> -1's.
>
+1
+1
Le lun. 29 mars 2021 à 15:06, Mick Semb Wever a écrit :
> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0-rc1 for release.
>
> sha1: 2facbc97ea215faef1735d9a3d5697162f61bc8c
> Git:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.0-rc1-tentative
> Maven Artifacts:
>
Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0-rc1 for release.
sha1: 2facbc97ea215faef1735d9a3d5697162f61bc8c
Git:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.0-rc1-tentative
Maven Artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1234/or
>
> I've also added a discussion item to the next board meeting.
>
Thanks.
To the PMC: the next boarding meeting is on 21st April, so we have time to
get this release out and probably more as well (hopefully with the fix
for CASSANDRA-16391) before that date.
To Justin: the board agenda item¹ a
31 matches
Mail list logo
