I agree as well. Nice work, Lorina!
This POC is a really good start. It has a bit more of a modern feel to it.
The navigation bar on the side makes the information very accessible. This
is a must for technical documentation.
Would it be possible to have a search bar somewhere on the site? I think
Thanks for the feedback, Murukesh! As I mentioned, the editing to fix all
the formatting is not completed, but I wanted to share the work so far to
get feedback.
I have not tailored most of the styling of the website. I literally used
the default antora UI, only changing the banner to green and ad
Just a note, to emphasize - I did not complete the conversion of all the
files from rSt to asciidoc yet. I wanted feedback that this direction
seemed acceptable to everyone.
Sylvain, I'll check out the tool you mention and see if it provides better
translation. A one-time conversion effort is just
Thanks for the insight Jun. It's great to hear that a process that's erring
on the side of flexibility, freedom, and under-prescription holds up well
in practice!
Have you folks run into any trouble w/lack of alignment (false negatives or
positives) on what qualifies as major?
>
>- Any major
Hi, everyone,
Just want to briefly share our experience in Apache Kafka. This may or may
not apply to the Cassandra community.
We started the KIP (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals)
process in 2015. The following is the summary of the process.
1. It's
Agreed. This is an awesome POC in a pretty short period of time.
I suspect with a little polish and cleanup this will be an improvement over
the existing site in every way.
Thanks for putting this together, Lorina!
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 7:36 AM Joshua McKenzie
wrote:
> Left bar navigation a
Is the AsciiDoc source also on GitHub?
Some things that I noticed:
- The FAQ sidebar navigation is great! The TOC list at the top isn't
needed at all now.
- In the breadcrumb trail (e.g., ASCIIDOC_POC > Cassandra > FAQ, or
ASCIIDOC_POC > Cassandra Documentation > Glossary), *Cassandra* in the
Ca
Agreed the navigation is nicer.
The content rst conversion is however far from perfect, especially in the
CQL parts. The grammar parts are all broken, most tables are really weird
(example:
https://polandll.github.io/site/ASCIIDOC_POC/4.0/cassandra/cql/types.html)
and we lost almost all linking in
I told the same to Lorina in person, +1 more fan
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 10:36, Joshua McKenzie wrote:
> Left bar navigation and content navigation on top right are both
> aesthetically and usability-wise quite superior IMO (comparing to
> https://cassandra.apache.org/doc/latest/getting_started/c
Integrated some feedback I got from Jon (good points both). Anyone else?
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 2:53 PM Joshua McKenzie
wrote:
> Thanks for that insight Pavel. Will be a helpful and useful reference as
> we start to test out our CEP process after 4.0 solidifies. One thing that
> really stood ou
Left bar navigation and content navigation on top right are both
aesthetically and usability-wise quite superior IMO (comparing to
https://cassandra.apache.org/doc/latest/getting_started/configuring.html).
I'm a fan.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 2:21 PM Lorina Poland wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> Based on
11 matches
Mail list logo
