+1 nb
-Original Message-
From: Mick Semb Wever
Sent: den 10 oktober 2019 07:08
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE-2] Apache Cassandra Release Lifecycle
> We have discussed in the email thread[1] about Apache Cassandra
> Release Lifecycle. We came up with a doc[2] for
> We have discussed in the email thread[1] about Apache Cassandra Release
> Lifecycle. We came up with a doc[2] for it. We have finalized the doc
> here[3] Please vote on it if you agree with the content of the doc [3].
+1 nb
the doc is good. it adds value for users, and does not need to b
OK, I checked with INFRA on some details and will finish the migration
tomorrow.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 11:32 AM Jon Haddad wrote:
> Awesome, thanks Michael.
>
> We need to do a little bit of additional configuration to have it switch
> over. Specifically, we need to set up the .asf.yaml config
+1, lets evolve the document as we gain more experience with the proposed
release lifecycle.
Dinesh
> On Oct 9, 2019, at 9:41 AM, Jon Haddad wrote:
>
> +1 works for me
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 9:30 AM Michael Shuler
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> --
>> Kind regards,
>> Michael
>>
>> On Wed, Oct
+1
Dinesh
> On Oct 9, 2019, at 12:41 PM, Joshua McKenzie wrote:
>
>>
>> each one of them is extremely low risk, which means that any validation
>> effort that has already happened won't have to be re-done
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 1:46 PM Jon Haddad wrote:
>
>> Seems reasonable, es
>
> each one of them is extremely low risk, which means that any validation
> effort that has already happened won't have to be re-done
+1
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 1:46 PM Jon Haddad wrote:
> Seems reasonable, especially since we're in alpha mode.
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:28 AM Aleksey Yeshc
Seems reasonable, especially since we're in alpha mode.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:28 AM Aleksey Yeshchenko
wrote:
> +1; in particular since the protocol itself is still in beta
>
> > On 9 Oct 2019, at 17:26, Oleksandr Petrov
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > During NGCC/ACNA19 we've had quite a few
+1; in particular since the protocol itself is still in beta
> On 9 Oct 2019, at 17:26, Oleksandr Petrov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> During NGCC/ACNA19 we've had quite a few conversations around the 4.0
> release. Many (minor) features and changes suggested during that time are
> possible to implement i
+1
On 09/10/2019, 17:50, "Oleksandr Petrov" wrote:
Hi,
During NGCC/ACNA19 we've had quite a few conversations around the 4.0
release. Many (minor) features and changes suggested during that time are
possible to implement in 4.next without any problem. However, some changes
Hi,
During NGCC/ACNA19 we've had quite a few conversations around the 4.0
release. Many (minor) features and changes suggested during that time are
possible to implement in 4.next without any problem. However, some changes
that seem to be very important for the community, which got mentioned in
se
+1 works for me
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 9:30 AM Michael Shuler
wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Michael
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 9:06 AM Aleksey Yeshchenko
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 as a rather reasonable starting point; we can make changes to the
> process in the future if need be.
> >
> > > On
+1
--
Kind regards,
Michael
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 9:06 AM Aleksey Yeshchenko
wrote:
>
> +1 as a rather reasonable starting point; we can make changes to the process
> in the future if need be.
>
> > On 8 Oct 2019, at 19:00, sankalp kohli wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >We have discussed in the ema
+1 as a rather reasonable starting point; we can make changes to the process in
the future if need be.
> On 8 Oct 2019, at 19:00, sankalp kohli wrote:
>
> Hi,
>We have discussed in the email thread[1] about Apache Cassandra Release
> Lifecycle. We came up with a doc[2] for it. We have final
13 matches
Mail list logo
