Contributing CASSANDRA-15295 to fix CommitLog deadlock

2019-08-30 Thread Zephyr Guo
Hi all, Could someone review CASSANDRA-15295 this? Thanks!

Re: Stability of MaterializedView in 3.11.x | 4.0

2019-08-30 Thread Jon Haddad
If you don't have any intent on running across multiple nodes, Cassandra is probably the wrong DB for you. Postgres will give you a better feature set for a single node. On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 5:23 AM Pankaj Gajjar wrote: > Understand it well, how about Cassandra running on single node, we don

Re: Stability of MaterializedView in 3.11.x | 4.0

2019-08-30 Thread Dor Laor
Single node indeed doesn't need repair so it's easier. There is an admission control issue with MVs since they can incur a huge amplification, a single change in the base can trigger 1000s of operations in the view and they run async*. Hinted handoff for the MV helps as well but isn't needed for y

Wishing you a happy weekend

2019-08-30 Thread Reem Hashimy
Good day, My name is Reem E. Hashimy, the Emirates Minister of State and Managing Director of the United Arab Emirates (Dubai) World Expo 2020 Committee. I am writing you to manage my funds I received as financial gratification from various foreign companies I assisted to receive participati

Re: 4.0 alpha before apachecon?

2019-08-30 Thread Aleksey Yeshchenko
Not really important IMO if we do or do not cut a new branch yet. So let’s hold off? But as mentioned on Slack, I really like the idea of cutting an alpha now, with clear understanding that the API will still slightly change before the 4.0-GA. There is enough complete work in trunk that will *n

Re: Stability of MaterializedView in 3.11.x | 4.0

2019-08-30 Thread Pankaj Gajjar
Understand it well, how about Cassandra running on single node, we don’t have cluster setup (3 nodes+ i.e). Does MVs perform well on single node machine ? Note: I know about HA, so lets keep it side for now and it's only possible when we have cluster setup. On 29/08/19, 06:21, "Dor Laor"

Re: 4.0 alpha before apachecon?

2019-08-30 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> > Let's just pull the trigger on it. We know there are a couple of rough > edges, but that is the point of an alpha. Is the idea to also cut 2.2.15, 3.0.19, and 3.11.5, at the same time as 4.0-alpha1 ? (Michael, have you the cycles for this?) regards, Mick ---