Re: Is my range read query behaving strange ?

2019-06-11 Thread Laxmikant Upadhyay
Does range query ignore purgable tombstone (which crossed grace period) in some cases? On Tue, Jun 11, 2019, 2:56 PM Laxmikant Upadhyay wrote: > In a 3 node cassandra 2.1.16 cluster where, one node has old mutation and > two nodes have evict-able (crossed gc grace period) tombstone produced by >

New row cache options proposition

2019-06-11 Thread Perez Felipe
Hi All, I would like to propose a new feature in the Cassandra row cache. The proposition is for the use-case when you have a table where most of the read access is done on a few columns and the table has millions of rows. To improve cache memory size I have 2 possible improvement propositions:

Re: "4.0: TBD" -> "4.0: Est. Q4 2019"?

2019-06-11 Thread Scott Andreas
Thanks for starting this discussion, Sumanth! Added a round of comments as well. Summarizing my non-binding feedback: I feel that many of the items under "Alpha" and "Beta" should be achieved prior to the release of an alpha, especially those related to correctness/safety, scope lock, feature c

Re: "4.0: TBD" -> "4.0: Est. Q4 2019"?

2019-06-11 Thread Joshua McKenzie
Had a few more points of feedback for you Sumanth; trying to get some clarity on how the PMC might function w/relation to the various votes and definitions. Thanks for the integration and continued effort on this - it's looking good! On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 9:45 AM Sumanth Pasupuleti < sumanth.pa

Re: "4.0: TBD" -> "4.0: Est. Q4 2019"?

2019-06-11 Thread Sumanth Pasupuleti
Thanks for the feedback on the product stages/ release life cycle document. I have incorporated the suggestions and looking for any additional feedback folks may have. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bS6sr-HSrHFjZb0welife6Qx7u3ZDgRiAoENMLYlfz8/edit# Thanks, Sumanth On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:

Re: Java8 compatibility broken in 4.0

2019-06-11 Thread Attila Wind
Hi All, Just FYI I did a Java 8 build (dist - to be more spcific, that involves $ ant artifacts) from 4.0 trunk (after git pull) on Sunday morning (so 9th of June) - there were no issues for me I did it on both Windows and Linux (Debian) machines Maybe there were commits since then.. I have n

Re: Java8 compatibility broken in 4.0

2019-06-11 Thread Sam Tunnicliffe
> On 11 Jun 2019, at 10:04, Tommy Stendahl wrote: > > Hi, > > I can't find a way to build 4.0 artifacts so I can run Cassandra using Java8. > Building the artifacts ("ant artifacts" or "ant mvn-install") requires > building with Java11 but since CASSANDRA-15108 the result is not Java8 > co

Re: Java8 compatibility broken in 4.0

2019-06-11 Thread Aleksey Yeshchenko
No, this is not intentional. At the very least for 4.0 we are going to keep compatibility with Java 8. > On 11 Jun 2019, at 10:04, Tommy Stendahl wrote: > > Hi, > > I can't find a way to build 4.0 artifacts so I can run Cassandra using Java8. > Building the artifacts ("ant artifacts" or "ant

Java8 compatibility broken in 4.0

2019-06-11 Thread Tommy Stendahl
Hi, I can't find a way to build 4.0 artifacts so I can run Cassandra using Java8. Building the artifacts ("ant artifacts" or "ant mvn-install") requires building with Java11 but since CASSANDRA-15108 the result is not Java8 compatible anymore, is this intentional or was this done by mistake? I