Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

1: A 2: +1 3: +1 4: +1 5: +1 6: +1 > On Dec 4, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Benedict Elliott Smith > wrote: > > Sorry, 4. Is inconsistent. First instance should be. > >> - 4. Priorities: Keep ‘High' priority > > >> On 4 Dec 2018, at 19:12, Benedict Elliott Smith > > wrote:

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

Sorry, 4. Is inconsistent. First instance should be. > - 4. Priorities: Keep ‘High' priority > On 4 Dec 2018, at 19:12, Benedict Elliott Smith wrote: > > Ok, so after an initial flurry everyone has lost interest :) > > I think we should take a quick poll (not a vote), on people’s positions o

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

Ok, so after an initial flurry everyone has lost interest :) I think we should take a quick poll (not a vote), on people’s positions on the questions raised so far. If people could try to take the time to stake a +1/-1, or A/B, for each item, that would be really great. This poll will not be