There is no need for another program. Keep the code in html, css and js.
People can modify that and show proposed changes in that. No need to convert
back and forth from other formats. If someone is doing something more
involved, they probably already have a program themselves.
-Origin
It would probably be more productive to list some specific concerns you have
with Hugo. Then explain why you think they make using it a bad idea. Then offer
some alternatives.
On 3/16/18, 1:18 PM, "Kenneth Brotman" wrote:
Thanks for that Eric Evans.
I'm not sure Hugo is the way
Thanks for that Eric Evans.
I'm not sure Hugo is the way to go. I don't see how I would generate the
quality of work I would want with it. It seems like another example of coders
learning and using a more complicated program to generate the code they could
have already generated - it’s a di
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Kenneth Brotman
wrote:
> Well pickle my cucumbers Jon! It's good to know that you have experience
> with Hugo, see it as a good fit and that all has been well. I look forward
> to the jira epic!
>
> How exactly does the group make such a decision: Call for fi
If anyone sees interesting uses of this related to the development of C*,
please email me privately as the very idea of such an inquiry seems to be
bothering some folks.
Kenneth Brotman
-Original Message-
From: Josh McKenzie [mailto:jmcken...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 5:
>
> It's off topic if there aren't any C* uses but I wasn't (still not sure)
> there aren't. Maybe you're missing out.
This dev list is for the development of C*. The type of discussion on this
email thread should be kept to user@.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Kenneth Brotman <
kenbrot...@yah
