Few things worth mentioning in the cassandra world this week:
1) If you somehow missed the cassandra-on-the-rocks(db) thread, you should
check it out:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6860e04d6ff58fb0f65fdaa6e9b53aedf0d432a88bed32107e7ccec8@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E
. FB/Instagram are pro
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:32 AM, benjamin roth wrote:
> I am not a PMC member or sth but just my 2 cents:
Somewhat off-topic here, but I'd like to start discouraging people
from prefacing remarks like this ("not a PMC member", "non-binding
+1"). The exchange rate here is 1:1 IMO, your 2 cents ar
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> Setting aside details of the implementation, does anyone feel that
> pluggable storage in itself is inherently a bad idea (so much so that you'd
> -1 it if someone else did the work)?
I don't think it's inherently a bad idea, no. I'm a little
I am not a PMC member or sth but just my 2 cents:
As long as it is designed from the ground to improve testability, this can
be a big chance.
If not - it will be a big risk.
Theres a huge difference between running a quick hack as a proof of concept
and designing a generic architecture and retain
