+1
--
AY
On 8 June 2016 at 16:31:35, Brandon Williams (dri...@gmail.com) wrote:
+1
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Jake Luciani wrote:
> I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.0.7.
>
> sha1: 040ac666ac5cdf9cd0a01a845f2ea0af3a81a08b
> Git:
>
> http://git-wip-us.apach
+1
--
AY
On 8 June 2016 at 14:21:58, Jake Luciani (j...@apache.org) wrote:
I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.7.
sha1: 6815dc970565e6cd1e0169b5379f37da7a5a8a32
Git:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.7-tentative
Artifacts:
+1
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Jake Luciani wrote:
> I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.7.
>
> sha1: 6815dc970565e6cd1e0169b5379f37da7a5a8a32
> Git:
>
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.7-tentative
> Artifacts:
>
> https://reposi
+1
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Jake Luciani wrote:
> I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.0.7.
>
> sha1: 040ac666ac5cdf9cd0a01a845f2ea0af3a81a08b
> Git:
>
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.0.7-tentative
> Artifacts:
>
> https://re
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 4:02 PM Sylvain Lebresne
wrote:
>
> Because we're trying to release on a fixed cadence if possible, we're
> freezing releases for testing in advance
> so we have some time to fix problems if we find some. You can see Jake's
> email from June 6 on the freeze
> of both 3.0.7
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:45 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> How are you guys verifying these releases so fast? Do you have verification
> scripts or something?
>
Because we're trying to release on a fixed cadence if possible, we're
freezing releases for testing in advance
so we have some time to fix p
How are you guys verifying these releases so fast? Do you have verification
scripts or something?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:44 PM Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Jake Luciani wrote:
>
> > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.7.
> >
> > sha1: 6815dc970
+1
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Jake Luciani wrote:
> I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.0.7.
>
> sha1: 040ac666ac5cdf9cd0a01a845f2ea0af3a81a08b
> Git:
>
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.0.7-tentative
> Artifacts:
>
> https://re
+1
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Jake Luciani wrote:
> I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.7.
>
> sha1: 6815dc970565e6cd1e0169b5379f37da7a5a8a32
> Git:
>
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.7-tentative
> Artifacts:
>
> https://reposi
+1
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Jake Luciani wrote:
> I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.0.7.
>
> sha1: 040ac666ac5cdf9cd0a01a845f2ea0af3a81a08b
> Git:
>
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.0.7-tentative
> Artifacts:
>
> https://re
+1
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Jake Luciani wrote:
> I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.7.
>
> sha1: 6815dc970565e6cd1e0169b5379f37da7a5a8a32
> Git:
>
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.7-tentative
> Artifacts:
>
> https://reposi
I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.0.7.
sha1: 040ac666ac5cdf9cd0a01a845f2ea0af3a81a08b
Git:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.0.7-tentative
Artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1115/org/apache
I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.7.
sha1: 6815dc970565e6cd1e0169b5379f37da7a5a8a32
Git:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.7-tentative
Artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1116/org/apache/cas
What a fun topic. I re-joined the list just for this.
As I understand, it the nature of the Apache Software Licence any corporate
entity is allows to produce open and closed source software based on Apache
Cassandra, however the Cassandra name is a trademark of the ASF foundation.
As I under it,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> FWIW, in very very ancient history we actually had the drivers in tree. It
> sucked, because the people who wanted to contribute to the drivers were for
> the most part not Committers, and the committers for the most part weren't
> intereste
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> In light of the confusion around documentation (people asking on dev list
> about driver docs or DataStax docs), I think we should accelerate the plans
> to finish migrating our official documentation from the MoinMoin wiki to
> our source t
16 matches
Mail list logo