So we would create a new permission class for JMX?
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Jan Karlsson
wrote:
> Hello fellow devs,
>
> Currently JMX authentication is handled by using a password file. I was
> thinking we could make this a little more sophisticated.
> What I propose is, we plug JMX so
Hi,
I understand that 8099 has put us in a difficult position. Nevertheless,
8099 is a kind of special case and in my opinion ignoring failing tests can
be a dangerous thing.
I am not against doing it for 3.0 and trunk but, if we do it, we should do
it only until we have recover from 8099.
[ima
Hello fellow devs,
Currently JMX authentication is handled by using a password file. I was
thinking we could make this a little more sophisticated.
What I propose is, we plug JMX so that it uses the internal authenticator
Cassandra has to authenticate the user. This will allow us to authenticate
