Re: cassandra-2.0.9 sstable2json ignoring “ss” in timestamp

2015-05-08 Thread Tyler Hobbs
Can you open a JIRA ticket with steps to reproduce? On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Arindam Bose wrote: > Hello > > Getting an issue with *cassandra2.0.9 sstable2json*; Why the date format in > json is *ignoring* the "ss"/*seconds* for the timestamp type column? > > eg: > > *actual - as I obser

cassandra-2.0.9 sstable2json ignoring “ss” in timestamp

2015-05-08 Thread Arindam Bose
Hello Getting an issue with *cassandra2.0.9 sstable2json*; Why the date format in json is *ignoring* the "ss"/*seconds* for the timestamp type column? eg: *actual - as I observed:* cql column definition: updatedtimestamp timestamp cql value:2013-10-17 10:35:23-0700 json data: ["updatedtimestamp

[GitHub] cassandra pull request:

2015-05-08 Thread rcaa
Github user rcaa commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/commit/ebab9d39196384f2b9f37cb241b276f8112ab281#commitcomment-11106822 In src/java/org/apache/cassandra/config/DatabaseDescriptor.java: In src/java/org/apache/cassandra/config/DatabaseDescriptor.jav

Re: cqlsh client side filtering

2015-05-08 Thread Jens Rantil
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > So we will most likely support your use case server side soon, protected > behind the ALLOW FILTERING flag. > Awesome, really that's all I wanted to hear. It covers our use-case. > But we definitively don't want to do > this only in cq

Re: cqlsh client side filtering

2015-05-08 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
> > It's also worth pointing out that making this kind of filtering performant > is _not_ a requirement (okay, using Spark below is too slow ;)). What I am > asking for here is a tooling feature, not something I would use for > production loads. Personally, I like how CQL is somewhat locked down fo

Re: cqlsh client side filtering

2015-05-08 Thread Jens Rantil
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Tyler Hobbs wrote: > There are general plans to increase the types of filtering that Cassandra > can do server-side, but CASSANDRA-8099 is necessary for a lot of that work. > > We prefer not to support things in cqlsh that can't be done through normal > cql queries