Hey Jonathan,
I have been hoping for this approach for years now-one of the reasons I left
Datastax was due to my feeling that quality was always on the backburner and
never really taken seriously vs marketing driven releases.
I sincerely hope this approach reverses that perceived trend.
--
Col
We are moving away from designating major releases like 3.0 as "special,"
other than as a marker of compatibility. In fact we are moving away from
major releases entirely, with each release being a much smaller, digestible
unit of change, and the ultimate goal of every even release being
productio
In this tick tock cycle, is there still a long term release that's
maintained, meant for production? Will bug fixes be back ported to 3.0
(stable) with new stuff going forward to 3.x?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:50 AM Aleksey Yeschenko
wrote:
> Hey Jason. I think pretty much everybody is on board
To add to this:
*Went well*
Tyler Hobbs has reduced failing dtests on trunk by ~90%. By next month,
test results should be at 100% pass.
*Went poorly*
We've failed to make progress on running the full test suite across all
contributor branches. By the end of this month, I assume we will at least
TL;DR - Benedict is right.
IMO Maven is a nice, straight-forward tool if you know what you’re doing and
start on a _new_ project.
But Maven easily becomes a pita if you want to do something that’s not
supported out-of-the-box.
I bet that Maven would just not work for C* source tree with all the
There are three distinct problems you raise: code structure, documentation,
and build system.
The build system, as far as I can tell, is a matter of personal preference.
I personally dislike the few interactions I've had with maven, but
gratefully my interactions with build system innards have bee
Hi all,
Not a cassandra contributor here, but I'm working on the cassandra sources
too.
This big cassandra source root caused me trouble too, firstly it was not
easy to import in an IDE, try to import cassandra sources in netbeans, it's
a headcache.
It would be great if we had more small modules