On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Peter Schuller wrote:
> > No I don't think you did, in fact, depending on the size of your SSTable
> a
> > contiguous range (or the entire SSTable) may or may not be affected by a
> > cleanup/move or any type of topology change. There is lots of room for
> > optim
> No I don't think you did, in fact, depending on the size of your SSTable a
> contiguous range (or the entire SSTable) may or may not be affected by a
> cleanup/move or any type of topology change. There is lots of room for
> optimization here. After loading the indexes we actually know start/end
+1
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> There is has been quite some changes since the beta1[1] (including some non
> trivial ones) and so while we still have a few outstanding small issues that
> may need to be addressed before calling for a release candidate, a new beta
>
> The SSTable indices should still be scanned for size tiered compaction.
> Do I miss anything here?
>
>
No I don't think you did, in fact, depending on the size of your SSTable a
contiguous range (or the entire SSTable) may or may not be affected by a
cleanup/move or any type of topology change. T
+1
Regards,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> There is has been quite some changes since the beta1[1] (including some non
> trivial ones) and so while we still have a few outstanding small issues
> that
> may need to be addressed before calling for a release candidate
+1
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> There is has been quite some changes since the beta1[1] (including some non
> trivial ones) and so while we still have a few outstanding small issues that
> may need to be addressed before calling for a release candidate, a new beta
>
There is has been quite some changes since the beta1[1] (including some non
trivial ones) and so while we still have a few outstanding small issues that
may need to be addressed before calling for a release candidate, a new beta
seems like the reasonable thing to do. I thus propose the following ar
