On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:21 PM, paul cannon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
>> There are also some matters of work-flow or process that we need to
>> hashed out. For example, how do we handle reviews now? Do we
>> continue to mandate/recommend/allow rebasing?
>>
>
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> There are also some matters of work-flow or process that we need to
> hashed out. For example, how do we handle reviews now? Do we
> continue to mandate/recommend/allow rebasing?
>
Surely we'd want to follow normal git practices here: rebasi
I had complains that my preceding mail was unreadable (thanks gmailfor
fucking my formatting up), so I've posted the same thing with nice
formatting on the JIRA ticket.
--
Sylvain
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> Ok, I think I'm warming up to what we're getting at. I wou
Ok, I think I'm warming up to what we're getting at. I would change
thesyntax of the VALUE() thing however. Instead of:CREATE TABLE
timeline ( userid int, posted_at uuid, body string, PRIMARY
KEY(user_id, posted_at), VALUE(body))I would prefer:CREATE COMPACT
TABLE timeline ( userid int,
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Dave Brosius wrote:
>>> doing
>>>
>>> git clone http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra.git cassandra
>>>
>>> proceeded as a normal clone until th
