On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>> I'm rather fond of how user-friendly the Python suite is (taking care
>> of server setup/teardown transparently) but realistically, now that we
>> have robust truncate, it's probably fine to require an existing server
>> and just use that.
>
>
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Rick Shaw wrote:
>> For what it is worth, my preference would be to have unit tests that would
>> form a regression testing package in the tree with the client sources.
>
> Ditto.
>
>> I think that makes me
