I agree that wikis are great for contribution; what I meant was that they're
rather poor at organising information for ease of discovery, especially by
new users.
I still like the idea of some more structured docs being managed by the
community though.
On 1 April 2011 02:16, Eric Evans wrote:
>
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 18:57 +0100, Nick Telford wrote:
> I don't think the Wiki is the right place for community maintained
> user docs; it doesn't have the necessary structure.
The wiki is great at what wikis are great at, lowering the barrier to
contribution. There is a lot of good stuff (some
I couldn't agree more, the DataStax docs (try saying that 3 times fast) are
definitely the most complete and user-friendly source for end-users, while
the wiki contains a lot more detailed information on the architecture and
internals.
Ideally, I'd like to see the user docs be in a place that the
I would be +1 on this. We need a good way to develop against
snapshots. Thanks for your work here Stephen.
Stu
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:35 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just an FYI.
>
> I have the required fixes for Maven ANT Tasks in place:
>
> http://jira.co
In response to the apparent mass confusion about nodetool repair that
became evidence in the thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/user@cassandra.apache.org/msg11755.html
I started looking around to see what is actually claimed about repair.
I found that the Datastax docs:
http://www.datasta
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 13:56 +0200, Bjorn Borud wrote:
> > (Hopefully )for the next version, we'll replace Thrift with a
> > dedicated protocol, one that eliminates the Thrift dependency, and
> > more importantly, implements streaming. This should be transparent
> > to applications for the most
Eric Evans writes:
> (Hopefully )for the next version, we'll replace Thrift with a dedicated
> protocol, one that eliminates the Thrift dependency, and more
> importantly, implements streaming. This should be transparent to
> applications for the most part though.
pardon my ignorance, is there
