Build failed in Hudson: Cassandra-0.7 #96

2010-12-18 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See Changes: [jbellis] merge from 0.6 [jbellis] flush before repair patch by thobbs; reviewed by Stu Hood for CASSANDRA-1748 [jbellis] fix logging contexts patch by Dave Brosius; reviewed by jbellis for CASSANDRA-1879

Re: [SOLVED] Very high memory utilization (not caused by mmap on sstables)

2010-12-18 Thread Zhu Han
Here is a typo, sorry... best regards, hanzhu On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Zhu Han wrote: > The problem seems still like the C-heap of JVM, which leaks 70MB every day. > Here is the summary: > > on 12/19: 010c3000 178548K rw---[ anon ] > on 12/18: 010c3000 110320K rw--

Re: [SOLVED] Very high memory utilization (not caused by mmap on sstables)

2010-12-18 Thread Zhu Han
The problem seems still like the C-heap of JVM, which leaks 70MB every day. Here is the summary: on 12/19: 010c3000 178548K rw---[ anon ] on 12/18: 010c3000 110320K rw---[ anon ] on 12/17: 010c3000 39256K rw---[ anon ] This should not be the JVM object heap, b

Re: [SOLVED] Very high memory utilization (not caused by mmap on sstables)

2010-12-18 Thread Daniel Korndorfer
I have a pre-production cluster with few data and similar problem... PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND 12916 0.0 80.0 5972756 3231120 ? Sl Oct18 15:49 /usr/bin/java -ea -Xms1G -Xmx1G -XX:+UseParNewGC ... Data dir: 2.2Mdata/ Att, Daniel Korndorfer Telecom

Re: Parallel Compaction

2010-12-18 Thread Germán Kondolf
I've created the patch ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1876 On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Germán Kondolf wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Germán Kondolf >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Jonathan for the feedb

Re: [SOLVED] Very high memory utilization (not caused by mmap on sstables)

2010-12-18 Thread SriSatish Ambati
Zhu, Couple of quick questions: How many threads are in your JVM? Can you also post the full commandline as well? Also, output of cat /proc/meminfo thanks, Sri On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Zhu Han wrote: > Seems like the problem there after I upgrade to "OpenJDK Runtime > Environment