Re: Question about ByteBuffer positions

2010-11-23 Thread Nate McCall
for your own code, I would stay with duplicate(), slice() and similar and just assume we will do something fancier than we currently are one day. The overhead of those methods is really small as it's just pointers to the same underlying buffer. On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Ed Anuff wrote: > I

Question about ByteBuffer positions

2010-11-23 Thread Ed Anuff
Is it safe to assume that anywhere that you're provided with a ByteBuffer that it's ok to leave it's position wherever you want or should you be calling buffer.duplicate() and working with your copy of the buffer? I've tried to trace anything that calls the new method signatures in AbstractType an

Build failed in Hudson: Cassandra-0.7 #28

2010-11-23 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See Changes: [jbellis] rebuild Strategy during system_update_keyspace patch by jbellis; reviewed by gdusbabek for CASSANDRA-1762 [jbellis] dos2unix json2sstable [gdusbabek] system test for add/drop index. patch by thobbs, reviewed

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 rc1

2010-11-23 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
+1 (non binding) On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Gary Dusbabek wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:41, Eric Evans wrote: >> >> Barring anything unforeseen, we should be just about there.  I propose >> the following for release as 0.7.0 RC1. >> >> SVN: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/

Build failed in Hudson: Cassandra-0.7 #27

2010-11-23 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See Changes: [jbellis] require index_type to be present when specifying index_name patch by Jon Hermes; reviewed by jbellis for CASSANDRA-1759 [gdusbabek] fix add/remove bugs in CFMetadata. patch by gdusbabek, reviewed by tjake. CA

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 rc1

2010-11-23 Thread Gary Dusbabek
+1 On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:41, Eric Evans wrote: > > Barring anything unforeseen, we should be just about there.  I propose > the following for release as 0.7.0 RC1. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1037265 > 0.7.0-rc1 artifacts: http://people.apach

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 rc1

2010-11-23 Thread Jonathan Ellis
+1 On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > > Barring anything unforeseen, we should be just about there.  I propose > the following for release as 0.7.0 RC1. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1037265 > 0.7.0-rc1 artifacts: http://people.ap

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 rc1

2010-11-23 Thread Brandon Williams
+1 On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > > Barring anything unforeseen, we should be just about there. I propose > the following for release as 0.7.0 RC1. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1037265 > 0.7.0-rc1 artifacts: http://people.a

Hudson build is back to normal : Cassandra-0.7 #26

2010-11-23 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See