A belated +1 as well.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 13:39, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> The list of changes[1] since 0.6.6 is fairly small, but there's been
> some interest in getting CASSANDRA-1656[2] (a HH bug) out to people. I
> propose the following for release as 0.6.7.
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/
+1
-Chris
On Nov 8, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Jonathan Ellis
> Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
> co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support
> http://riptano.com
+1
--
Jonathan Ellis
Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support
http://riptano.com
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> The list of changes[1] since 0.6.6 is fairly small, but there's been
> some interest in getting CASSANDRA-1656[2] (a HH bug) out to people. I
> propose the following for release as 0.6.7.
>
+1
No chance to test the brownie recipe though.
-
Dragos,
How many SSTables did you have on disk, and were any of your index expressions
GT(E)/LT(E)?
I expect that you are bumping into a limitation of the current implementation:
it opens up to 128 file-handles per SSTable in the worst case for a GT/LT query
(one per index bucket).
A future v
Hi,
I've got an exception during the following test:
test machine: core 2 duo 2.93 2GB RAM Ubuntu 10.04
test scenario:
- 1 column family
- about 15 columns
- 7 indexed columns (bitmap)
- 26 million rows (insert operation went fine)
- thrift "query" on 3 of the indexed columns with get_indexed_sl
