Re: Help on dynamic creation of CF

2010-10-12 Thread gagandip Singh
I am also new to the Cassandra world but I think that is not possible on 0.6 version. This is feature is provided in 0.7 version which is in beta right now. You can download it from Cassandra site. Thanks, Gagan On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Wicked J wrote: > Hi, > I'm using Cassandra v0.6.

Help on dynamic creation of CF

2010-10-12 Thread Wicked J
Hi, I'm using Cassandra v0.6.4 and wondering how can my app. dynamically create Column Families? Thanks!

Re: Status of LT LTE without EQ op for 0.7 release

2010-10-12 Thread Tyler Hobbs
I'm not completely sure I follow your scheme, but it's fairly to support GT, LT, etc with your own index. Use a row for your index where the columns names are the data values you want to index. If you set the comparator type (in your example, this would be LongType), you can perform a LT or GT qu

Re: Status of LT LTE without EQ op for 0.7 release

2010-10-12 Thread Todd Nine
Thanks Johnathan, A follow up question. Will it be possible to migrate existing indexes in a future release as part of the upgrade path to support LT and LTE ops without equal? In the meantime in my Datanucleus Plugin I was thinking I could do something like the following. It's not efficie

Re: Status of LT LTE without EQ op for 0.7 release

2010-10-12 Thread Todd Nine
Fair enough! Thanks Jonathan. todd SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER todd nine| spidertracks ltd | 117a the square po box 5203 | palmerston north 4441 | new zealand P: +64 6 353 3395 | M: +64 210 255 8576 E: t...@spidertracks.co.nz W: www.spidertracks.com On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 18:47 -0500

Re: [VOTE] 0.6.6 RC1

2010-10-12 Thread Jonathan Ellis
+1 On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > > Lot's of good work[1] has made it into the 0.6 branch since 0.6.5, I > propose an 0.6.6 release. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1021381 > 0.6.5-rc2 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans

Re: Status of LT LTE without EQ op for 0.7 release

2010-10-12 Thread Jonathan Ellis
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Todd Nine wrote: > Currently there is only indexing for LT and LTE expression when an EQ > operator is present.  Will it be possible to use the LT and LTE ops > without an EQ by the 0.7.0 release? No. >  If not, which of the following > would be more efficient? >

Status of LT LTE without EQ op for 0.7 release

2010-10-12 Thread Todd Nine
Hey guys, I've been digging through JIRA and all related issued for secondary indexing for use within my Datanucleus Plugin. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-749 Currently there is only indexing for LT and LTE expression when an EQ operator is present. Will it be possible to us

Re: [VOTE] 0.6.6 RC1

2010-10-12 Thread Brandon Williams
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > > Lot's of good work[1] has made it into the 0.6 branch since 0.6.5, I > propose an 0.6.6 release. > +1 -Brandon

Hudson build is back to normal : Cassandra #563

2010-10-12 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See

Re: [VOTE] 0.6.6 RC1

2010-10-12 Thread Gary Dusbabek
+1 On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:45, Eric Evans wrote: > > Lot's of good work[1] has made it into the 0.6 branch since 0.6.5, I > propose an 0.6.6 release. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1021381 > 0.6.5-rc2 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans >