On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 12:37 -0500, Eric Evans wrote:
> >> It feels like 0.7.0-beta1 is becoming too distant a spec in
> >> the rear-view, and the delta[1] is becoming quite large. I
> >> propose we vote to release a new beta.
>
> > The previous vote was waved off, so here is a new one.
>
> 3rd t
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Zhu Han wrote:
>> They have however at least one advantage:
>> - your super columns are indexed, you don't have to deserialize them
>> entirely each time.
>>
>
> The size of counter super column is limited to how many replicas propagated
> values as the lead re
> They have however at least one advantage:
> - your super columns are indexed, you don't have to deserialize them
>entirely each time.
>
The size of counter super column is limited to how many replicas propagated
values as the lead replica. It's size is upper bounded by the number of
repli
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Ryan King wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
>>> I agree that it is worth adding a support for counter as supercolumns
>>> in 1546 and that's fairly trivial, so I will add t
