Re: Client developer mailing list

awesome, thanks, I'm subscribed :) On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Jeremy Hanna wrote: > There has been a new mailing list created for those who are working on > Cassandra clients above thrift and/or avro. You can subscribe by sending an > email to client-dev-subscr...@cassandra.apache.org or

Client developer mailing list

There has been a new mailing list created for those who are working on Cassandra clients above thrift and/or avro. You can subscribe by sending an email to client-dev-subscr...@cassandra.apache.org or using the link at the bottom of http://cassandra.apache.org The list is meant to give client

RE: cassandra disk usage

Also, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1207 -Original Message- From: "Terje Marthinussen" Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 6:58am To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: cassandra disk usage Hi, Was just looking at a SSTable file after loading a dataset. The data load has

Re: benchmarking of thrift versus avro

On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:43 -0400, Phil Stanhope wrote: > Has there been any benchmarking done on thrift vs avro bindings in 0.7 > codebase? No, it's kinda early for that. First priority IMO is to reach feature parity with the thrift side, and then get comprehensive functional tests to make sure

Re: benchmarking of thrift versus avro

Thanks. The development was started in March. Have shifted through each of the 0.6 releases with no problems so far. The jump to 0.7 creates many opportunities. For example I have use case for dynamic keyspaces that could result in hundreds created per quarter once in production. I'd like to focu

Re: benchmarking of thrift versus avro

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Phil Stanhope wrote: > Has there been any benchmarking done on thrift vs avro bindings in 0.7 > codebase? > > If one was about to bring into alpha production in the Jan 2011 timeframe, > would going with avro be recommended? If you're starting dev now or soon, I

benchmarking of thrift versus avro

Has there been any benchmarking done on thrift vs avro bindings in 0.7 codebase? If one was about to bring into alpha production in the Jan 2011 timeframe, would going with avro be recommended? If one was to benchmark ... I'd be more interested in benchmarks that measure access to a node that act

Re: column family names

On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 18:01 +0900, Terje Marthinussen wrote: > > Now that we can make columns families on the fly, it gets interesting > to use > column families more as part of the data model (can reduce diskspace > quite a > bit vs. super columns in some cases). > > However, currently, the colu

Re: cassandra disk usage

column names are stored per cell (moving to user@) On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Terje Marthinussen wrote: > Hi, > > Was just looking at a SSTable file after loading a dataset. The data load > has no updates of data  but: > - Columns can in some rare cases be added to existing super columns >

Build failed in Hudson: Cassandra #523

See -- [...truncated 1509 lines...] [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.095 sec [junit] [junit] Cobertura: Loaded information on 909 classes. [junit] Cobertura:

cassandra disk usage

Hi, Was just looking at a SSTable file after loading a dataset. The data load has no updates of data but: - Columns can in some rare cases be added to existing super columns - SuperColumns will be added to the same key (but not overwriting existing data). I batch these, but it is quite likely tha

column family names

Hi, Now that we can make columns families on the fly, it gets interesting to use column families more as part of the data model (can reduce diskspace quite a bit vs. super columns in some cases). However, currently, the column family name validator is pretty strict allowing only word characters a