No problem,
I didn't want to implement my own solution if an existing one could
easily be applied. Since I'll be creating CF that represent secondary
indexes, I'll need to perform range scans over the keys of those
secondary index CFs. The column names within the CF's are the row keys
of the pr
No chance that 749 can be backported to 0.6, sorry.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Todd Nine wrote:
> Lets try that again.
>
> This is the intended issue.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-749
>
> thanks,
> Todd
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 20:02 -0500, Jonathan Elli
Lets try that again.
This is the intended issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-749
thanks,
Todd
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 20:02 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> What issue were you trying to link? :)
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Todd Nine wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm
What issue were you trying to link? :)
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Todd Nine wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm implementing a Datanucleus plugin for Cassandra. I'm finished
> with the basic functionality, and everything seems to work pretty well.
> Now my issue is performing secondary indexing on fie
Hi all,
I'm implementing a Datanucleus plugin for Cassandra. I'm finished
with the basic functionality, and everything seems to work pretty well.
Now my issue is performing secondary indexing on fields within my data.
I have outlined some of the issues I'm facing in this post.
http://www.datanu
system.log should be be in build/test/logs after ant test
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Masood Mortazavi
wrote:
> For revision 955080
>
> "ant test" builds with no failures on Mac OS-X 10.6.2
>
> It fails on Windows XP 2002 SP3.
>
> Does running target "test" log anything anywhere?
>
> - m.
>
For revision 955080
"ant test" builds with no failures on Mac OS-X 10.6.2
It fails on Windows XP 2002 SP3.
Does running target "test" log anything anywhere?
- m.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Masood Mortazavi
> wrote:
> > The comment on the top of RackAwareStrategy says:
>
> You are correct. RAS sort of works under other conditions but it is
> primarily intended for 2 DCs and RF=3. I will up
On Jun 15, 2010, at 12:43 AM, Masood Mortazavi wrote:
> Is the clearer interpretation of this statement (in
> conf/datacenters.properties) given anywhere else?
>
> # The sum of all the datacenter replication factor values should equal
> # the replication factor of the keyspace (i.e. sum(dc_rf) =
(moving to user@)
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Masood Mortazavi
wrote:
> Is the clearer interpretation of this statement (in
> conf/datacenters.properties) given anywhere else?
>
> # The sum of all the datacenter replication factor values should equal
> # the replication factor of the keyspa
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Masood Mortazavi
wrote:
> The comment on the top of RackAwareStrategy says:
You are correct. RAS sort of works under other conditions but it is
primarily intended for 2 DCs and RF=3. I will update the comment in
question.
> There are other issues to think abou
There have been a couple proposals to split the sstables a node
maintains into several pieces, one for each of a group of sub-ranges
that the nodes divides its token range into. (This could be done with
or without explicitly giving each node multiple Tokens, IMO.)
This would be a substantial chan
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Masood Mortazavi
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:04 PM, David Strauss wrote:
>
>> On 2010-06-15 03:58, Masood Mortazavi wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > My assumption is that what one finds in
>> >
>> > interface/thrift/gen-java
>> >
>> > is actually generated co
13 matches
Mail list logo
