+1
2010/4/12 Jonathan Ellis
> +1
>
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> >
> > It's been about a week and half since rc1 and there aren't any serious
> > issues so I propose we release. The tag and artifacts below should
> > differ from rc1 only in that the versioning was updat
+1
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> It's been about a week and half since rc1 and there aren't any serious
> issues so I propose we release. The tag and artifacts below should
> differ from rc1 only in that the versioning was updated.
>
> SVN Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/re
On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 19:00 -0700, Matthieu Riou wrote:
> FWIW there's no need to wait once the whole PMC voted.
Sure. But it's been awhile since we've had the entire PMC participate in
a release vote. :)
--
Eric Evans
eev...@rackspace.com
+1
FWIW there's no need to wait once the whole PMC voted.
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> It's been about a week and half since rc1 and there aren't any serious
> issues so I propose we release. The tag and artifacts below should
> differ from rc1 only in that the version
+1
-Chris
On Apr 11, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> It's been about a week and half since rc1 and there aren't any serious
> issues so I propose we release. The tag and artifacts below should
> differ from rc1 only in that the versioning was updated.
>
> SVN Tag:
> https://svn.apache.
It's been about a week and half since rc1 and there aren't any serious
issues so I propose we release. The tag and artifacts below should
differ from rc1 only in that the versioning was updated.
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.6.0
0.6.0 artifacts: http://peopl
Hi,
I don't know whether I have missed anything here, but can we get columns for
multiple Super Column Names at a time, like what we can do for Keys (by key
range or list of keys) or columns (by column range or column list)?
While I'm doing the work with Cassandra, I usually think the structure l
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Tatu Saloranta wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Hannes Schmidt
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Gary Dusbabek
> wrote:
> ...
> >> Why? "To make things easier for mvn users" isn't enough of an
> >> argument to convince me.
> >>
> >
> > I can
Bottom line with this kind of a project is to go with what you're most
familiar with. If you're equally unfamiliar with all frameworks, then the
quality of documentation becomes more important.
Personally, I'd take a hard look at Werkzeug--it's a library, not a
framework. Which means you get to
