Hi Ruben,
We use RepeateUnion in our downstream project to process tree structures.
And for us, it works like charm.
I looked through the proposed changes and I find them reasonable.
RelBuilder API is the same, so, most client code should still work.
Thanks for your contribution!
Regards,
Igor
On
Thanks for the feedback Julian.
I will take a look at the Morel issue.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 11:12 PM Julian Hyde wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up. There was a good reason that we marked
> RepeatUnion experimental: so that we can make these improvements without
> anyone complaining. I welcome
Thanks for the heads up. There was a good reason that we marked RepeatUnion
experimental: so that we can make these improvements without anyone
complaining. I welcome these changes evolving RepeatUnion into a more useful
feature.
By the way, in Morel I am having some deep discussions about the
Hello everyone,
I am not sure if anyone else (apart from my downstream project) is using
RepeatUnion and associated operators to build recursive unions
(experimental feature implemented via [1]), but just in case: I am
considering a patch to fix some known issues ([2] & [3]) on the current
impleme
