Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.24.0

2020-07-09 Thread Chunwei Lei
Rui, > Question: are you planning to follow the practice of the last release (i.e. lock master branch and clean up JIRA with fix version 1.24.0 marked before re-open master branch?) Yes, I think so. Best, Chunwei On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 2:43 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > We have 174 open PRs. Quit

Re: Calcite PR CI offten failed due to elasticsearch:test

2020-07-09 Thread Andrei Sereda
Hello, I'll take a look at failing tests. It seems that embedded ES doesn't start correctly. Andrei. On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 10:21 PM JiaTao Tao wrote: > another case > https://travis-ci.org/github/apache/calcite/jobs/706573803 > > FAILURE 0.0sec, org.apache.calcite.test.RelMetadataTest > > t

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4118) RexSimplify might remove CAST from RexNode incorrectly

2020-07-09 Thread Shuo Cheng (Jira)
Shuo Cheng created CALCITE-4118: --- Summary: RexSimplify might remove CAST from RexNode incorrectly Key: CALCITE-4118 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4118 Project: Calcite Issu

Re: Calcite PR CI offten failed due to elasticsearch:test

2020-07-09 Thread JiaTao Tao
another case https://travis-ci.org/github/apache/calcite/jobs/706573803 FAILURE 0.0sec, org.apache.calcite.test.RelMetadataTest > testPullUpPredicatesFromUnion2() java.lang.AssertionError: Expected: "[=($0, 1), OR(AND(=($1, 2), =($2, 3)), =($1, 4))]" but: was "[=($0, 1), OR(AND(

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.24.0

2020-07-09 Thread Julian Hyde
We have 174 open PRs. Quite a few of these are high-quality and ready to go in, and they are not from committers, so they don't stand a chance unless a committer takes the time to look at them. New contributors will become demoralized if they do good work and it is never looked at. In the next 5 d

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.24.0

2020-07-09 Thread Rui Wang
Thanks Chunwei, I am actively working on getting CALCITE-4000 and CALCITE-4015 reviewed and merged by next week. Question: are you planning to follow the practice of the last release (i.e. lock master branch and clean up JIRA with fix version 1.24.0 marked before re-open master branch?) -Rui

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.24.0

2020-07-09 Thread Julian Hyde
Chunwei, Thanks for kicking this off. RC on 7/14 sounds good. I have logged https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4117 ("Release Calcite 1.24.0") and assigned it to you. I have a couple of bugs that I want to make depend on it (i.e. they can only be fixed AFTER 1.24). On Wed, Jul 8, 2020

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4117) Release Calcite 1.24.0

2020-07-09 Thread Julian Hyde (Jira)
Julian Hyde created CALCITE-4117: Summary: Release Calcite 1.24.0 Key: CALCITE-4117 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4117 Project: Calcite Issue Type: Bug Report

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4116) Remove unused code for tracking RexNode's nullable state in codegen

2020-07-09 Thread Feng Zhu (Jira)
Feng Zhu created CALCITE-4116: - Summary: Remove unused code for tracking RexNode's nullable state in codegen Key: CALCITE-4116 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4116 Project: Calcite

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4115) Improve the prompt of using SQL keywords for sql parser

2020-07-09 Thread Danny Chen (Jira)
Danny Chen created CALCITE-4115: --- Summary: Improve the prompt of using SQL keywords for sql parser Key: CALCITE-4115 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4115 Project: Calcite Iss