+1 non-binding.
I have checked
- [x] the links of the package are valid;
- [x] the checksum of the package is valid;
- [x] the signature of the package is valid;
- [x] RELEASE_VERSION in the source code matches the current release;
- [x] LICENSE and NOTICE are not absent, note that we use CI based
+1 binding.
I have checked
- [x] the links of the package are valid;
- [x] the checksum of the package is valid;
- [x] the signature of the package is valid;
- [x] RELEASE_VERSION in the source code matches the current release;
- [x] LICENSE and NOTICE are not absent, note that we use CI based on
+1 binding
I've checked
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
release.
Best regards,
James
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 9:09 PM Lorin Lee wrote:
> Hi Apache bRPC Community,
>
> This is a call
+1 non-binding.
I have checked that
- [x] the links of the package are valid;
- [x] the checksum of the package is valid;
- [x] the signature of the package is valid;
- [x] RELEASE_VERSION in the source code matches the current release;
- [x] LICENSE and NOTICE are not absent, note that we use CI
+1 non-binding.
I have checked that
- [x] the links of the package are valid;
- [x] the checksum of the package is valid;
- [x] the signature of the package is valid;
- [x] RELEASE_VERSION in the source code matches the current release;
- [x] LICENSE and NOTICE are not absent, note that we use CI
+1 binding
I have checked:
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
release.
[x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each brpc repo.
[x] All files have license headers if necessary.
[x] No c
+1 non-binding.
I have checked that
- [x] the links of the package are valid;
- [x] the checksum of the package is valid;
- [x] the signature of the package is valid;
- [x] RELEASE_VERSION in the source code matches the current release;
- [x] LICENSE and NOTICE are not absent, note that we use CI