Jack,
Awesome! Glad to know the PR is finally out for review.
Sijie
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:48 AM Jack Vanlightly
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The BP-46 running without the journal changes are ready for review.
>
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2936
>
> You can view the BP PR here:
> ht
Hi all,
The BP-46 running without the journal changes are ready for review.
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2936
You can view the BP PR here: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2706
Also Ivan and I did a talk about it which might help describe some of the
context around the jou
I have created BP-44 for this proposal.
Regarding Flavio's questions, we can address those during the review
process and Ivan can chip in regarding the performance aspects.
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/2705
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2706
Jack
On Wed, May 5, 2021 a
Great news!
I'm so excited to see it at work :)
Diego
Il giorno mar 4 mag 2021 alle ore 20:38 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
jujj...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > how you justify removing the ledger as opposed to removing the ledger
> storage and preserving the journal
>
> I will be waiting for the BP
> how you justify removing the ledger as opposed to removing the ledger
storage and preserving the journal
I will be waiting for the BP on this point too. :) But glad to see that we
are working to avoid double writes. :)
With the EntryLogPerLedger (ELPL) feature, it is a more-or-less journal per
l
HI!
I know we are interested in this for sure. (cc @Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri
)
Is this similar to Matteo Merli's PR which I found was simple and still got
the job done: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2401/files
Regards,
Anup
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 8:04 AM Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> +
+1, it makes sense to enable bookies to run without duplicating IOs for entry
data. I'm curious to see how you justify removing the ledger as opposed to
removing the ledger storage and preserving the journal. I suspect that the
random reads against the ledger storage matter more to you than the
Il giorno lun 3 mag 2021 alle ore 16:30 Jack Vanlightly
ha scritto:
>
> Hi all,
>
> At Splunk we have defined and implemented changes to BookKeeper to allow
> bookies to run without the journal. The motivation for this work is to
> allow BookKeeper to be run with lower operating costs while still
Hi all,
At Splunk we have defined and implemented changes to BookKeeper to allow
bookies to run without the journal. The motivation for this work is to
allow BookKeeper to be run with lower operating costs while still offering
decent data safety guarantees.
Before submitting the work as a PR we'd
