On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 6:25 AM, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> 2018-02-26 13:34 GMT+01:00 Ivan Kelly :
>
> > I did most of this a few years back, and the first cut isn't too hard.
> > You have to move all the proto package out though, and then slowly
> > move stuff back in.
> >
> > Another thing to co
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:34 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
> I did most of this a few years back, and the first cut isn't too hard.
> You have to move all the proto package out though, and then slowly
> move stuff back in.
>
> Another thing to consider, though not for the first step, is that
> eventually
2018-02-26 13:34 GMT+01:00 Ivan Kelly :
> I did most of this a few years back, and the first cut isn't too hard.
> You have to move all the proto package out though, and then slowly
> move stuff back in.
>
> Another thing to consider, though not for the first step, is that
> eventually there will
I did most of this a few years back, and the first cut isn't too hard.
You have to move all the proto package out though, and then slowly
move stuff back in.
Another thing to consider, though not for the first step, is that
eventually there will be different versions of the client, depending
on wh
Yes, we should split the modules at 4.8. And there is already a task marked
for it at 4.8. And yes, the tests would live at bookkeeper-server modules,
only client implementation is moved out.
However i dont think we are there to easily split the client module by just
doing repo refactor. It has a
