Anup
Thanks for asking.
Il Ven 1 Mag 2020, 00:27 Anup Ghatage ha scritto:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Just circling back here as I am finishing up development on the auditing
> feature, I have a few questions for upstream consumers of
> BookieShell/bkctl.
> Are there any other scripts / probes / tests with
Hi Folks,
Just circling back here as I am finishing up development on the auditing
feature, I have a few questions for upstream consumers of BookieShell/bkctl.
Are there any other scripts / probes / tests within the pulsar / herddb
ecosystem which make use of the BookieShell log output?
Please let
Thanks Sijie, done.
Regards,
Anup
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 1:39 PM Sijie Guo wrote:
> +1 the proposal looks good to me.
>
> If there is no objections about this, you can submit the proposal to bk
> website, following the process here:
> http://bookkeeper.apache.org/community/bookkeeper_proposals/
+1 the proposal looks good to me.
If there is no objections about this, you can submit the proposal to bk
website, following the process here:
http://bookkeeper.apache.org/community/bookkeeper_proposals/
Thanks,
Sijie
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:11 PM Anup Ghatage wrote:
> Hi Everyone!,
>
> I hav
Hmm yes, good point!
Will keep that in mind and make the appropriate changes for bkctl as well.
> Unfortunately there is no doc :)
Sounds like a good opportunity to put together something!
Regards,
Anup
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:10 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Good
>
> Can you please take into
Good
Can you please take into account the 'new shell' we released with latest
versions 4.9 and 4.10?
The name is 'bkctl', we are bundling it with the binary distribution and as
a separate standalone package
The work would be the same.
We should deprecate BookieShell, if you look at the code you w