Re: [DISCUSS] End-Of-Life for some release lines

2022-11-15 Thread Enrico Olivelli
If nobody objects I will send a official email to user@ and dev@ to declare all of the release lines prior to 4.14.x as EOL: - no more releases - no more security fixes - no more patches committed to those branches I don't think we need a VOTE for this given this discussion. I will also update th

Re: [DISCUSS] End-Of-Life for some release lines

2022-09-30 Thread Andrey Yegorov
I agree. Upgrades from 4.11+ up to 4.14 are straightforward (e.g. DataStax's fork of Pulsar 2.7 uses BK 4.14). BK 4.15 has breaking API changes so we'll need to keep 4.14 alive for a while. On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 11:43 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hello, > I propose to declare end-of-life on al

Re: [DISCUSS] End-Of-Life for some release lines

2022-09-27 Thread Hang Chen
I Agree. > I propose to declare end-of-life on all the release lines prior to 4.14. I think we should have a clear end-of-life policy for BookKeeper. > For me having two release lines is acceptable. We'd better not define the end-of-life policy based on the release lines number. Thanks, Hang

Re: [DISCUSS] End-Of-Life for some release lines

2022-09-27 Thread Yong Zhang
Agree. >In my opinion we should formalize this process in order to have a clear vision when 4.16.0 will be out. This will also help users to understand the entire lifecycle of the project. For me having two release lines is acceptable. I think that depends on how long we will stay on a major vers

Re: [DISCUSS] End-Of-Life for some release lines

2022-09-27 Thread Michael Marshall
Makes sense to me. Is the upgrade path straightforward? For example, Apache Pulsar 2.7.5 currently uses release line 4.12, so it would need to be upgraded to at least 4.14 if we wanted to stay on a supported version. Thanks, Michael On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:08 AM steven lu wrote: > > +1 I agre

Re: [DISCUSS] End-Of-Life for some release lines

2022-09-27 Thread steven lu
+1 I agree. Nicolò Boschi 于2022年9月27日周二 16:00写道: > I agree. And it actually reflects what we're doing in the community (only > cherry-pick to branches 4.14 and 4.15). > > In my opinion we should formalize this process in order to have a clear > vision when 4.16.0 will be out. > This will also he

Re: [DISCUSS] End-Of-Life for some release lines

2022-09-27 Thread Nicolò Boschi
I agree. And it actually reflects what we're doing in the community (only cherry-pick to branches 4.14 and 4.15). In my opinion we should formalize this process in order to have a clear vision when 4.16.0 will be out. This will also help users to understand the entire lifecycle of the project. Fo