On Sep 29, 2017 3:54 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" wrote:
2017-09-29 5:46 GMT+02:00 Jia Zhai :
> How about make class OrderedSafeExecutor extends OrderedScheduler. then
all
> the old reference in bk will not need change, and in future dl will also
> survive?
>
Jia
I think this is a good idea
In the sc
2017-09-29 5:46 GMT+02:00 Jia Zhai :
> How about make class OrderedSafeExecutor extends OrderedScheduler. then all
> the old reference in bk will not need change, and in future dl will also
> survive?
>
Jia
I think this is a good idea
In the scope of the patch for BP-15 I would like to deliver t
How about make class OrderedSafeExecutor extends OrderedScheduler. then all
the old reference in bk will not need change, and in future dl will also
survive?
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> 2017-09-27 16:14 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo :
>
> > On Sep 27, 2017 5:12 AM, "Enrico O
2017-09-27 16:14 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo :
> On Sep 27, 2017 5:12 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" wrote:
>
> Hi,
> we are porting (cut and paste) many utilities from DistributedLog to
> BookKeeper,
>
> Do we have a clear roadmap on this work ?
>
>
> I think it only makes sense to port when this class is going
On Sep 27, 2017 5:12 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" wrote:
Hi,
we are porting (cut and paste) many utilities from DistributedLog to
BookKeeper,
Do we have a clear roadmap on this work ?
I think it only makes sense to port when this class is going to be used by
both BK and DL. It is a defer/lazy operati
Hi,
we are porting (cut and paste) many utilities from DistributedLog to
BookKeeper,
Do we have a clear roadmap on this work ?
I think that this makes sense especially if we are going to drop such
classes from DistributeLog.
All the ported utilities are a great work and it is very valuable and I
