e to our customers).
> >> > Since BK is a much younger project I don’t expect that the move to
> >> Java11
> >> > will be a problem. I think that Pulsar still supports Java8.
> >> >
> >> > Even in the case that the ZK team will decide to not go
en in the case that the ZK team will decide to not go down that route
>> > (and still maintain Java8 support) I think that we should plan that move
>> > for BK to prevent a similar situation in the future (naturally, as soon
>> as
>> > Pulsar will drop support for J
gt; Alessandro Luccaroni
> > Platform Manager @ Diennea - MagNews
> > Tel.: (+39) 0546 066100 Int. 924 - Mob.: (+39) 393 7273519
> > Viale G.Marconi 30/14 - 48018 Faenza (RA) - Italy
> >
> > Da: Enrico Olivelli
> > Inviato: mercoledì 21 ottobre 2020 11:24
> > A
elli
> Inviato: mercoledì 21 ottobre 2020 11:24
> A: Bookkeeper-Dev ; user <
> u...@bookkeeper.apache.org>
> Oggetto: Moving BooKeeper to JDK11
>
> Hello guys,
> (crossposting to user and dev)
> In the ZooKeeper project there is an open discussion about moving
> ZooKeeper 3.7 to JDK1
Int. 924 - Mob.: (+39) 393 7273519
Viale G.Marconi 30/14 - 48018 Faenza (RA) - Italy
Da: Enrico Olivelli
Inviato: mercoledì 21 ottobre 2020 11:24
A: Bookkeeper-Dev ; user
Oggetto: Moving BooKeeper to JDK11
Hello guys,
(crossposting to user and dev)
In the ZooKeeper project there is an open
Hello guys,
(crossposting to user and dev)
In the ZooKeeper project there is an open discussion about moving ZooKeeper
3.7 to JDK11 and basically dropping support for JDK8 in the client.
If they go that route we will probably need to move in the same direction.
How do you feel about this?
Is JDK8
