+1
-sha, md5 check out
-built source
-binary package verified
-Dave
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:40 AM Sijie Guo wrote:
> +1
>
> - sha, md5, signatures are alll good
> - licence header checking is good
> - pass findbugs
> - built source package and run all tests
> - binary package distribution l
+1
- sha, md5, signatures are alll good
- licence header checking is good
- pass findbugs
- built source package and run all tests
- binary package distribution looks good
- Sijie
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release can
+1 from me
- Sha, md5, gpg signatures are good
- rat & findbugs pass
- tests pass eventually
(TestRackawareEnsemblePlacementPolicyUsingScript is still flakey as
hell)
- Code matches the tag
- NOTICE file in binary looks good
- LICENSE file in binary looks mostly good (there's still a reference
to
+1,
- verified packages checksum (md5, asc and sha1 all good)
- the source package build and test all run successfully.
- NOTICE, DISCLAIME, License headers in binary package look good.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the relea
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
4.5.1, as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* Release notes [1]
* The off
